Closed gforney closed 9 years ago
The case runs for me on our linux cluster at NIST. I am using 7 processes (threads).
FDS processes each of the 6 meshes on dedicated cores, and it combines the 4 evac meshes
on one.
Timo -- do you see any problems?
Original issue reported on code.google.com by mcgratta
on 2014-04-02 14:29:30
Well, I try it in our Linux cluster.
Timo
Original issue reported on code.google.com by tkorhon1
on 2014-04-03 11:44:11
I tried the fds 6.0.1 version (the same SVN that is on the
downloads page or at least used to be for the Windows. I.e.,
the last Windows version that I downloaded):
Compilation Date : Tue, 26 Nov 2013
Current Date : April 3, 2014 14:47:48
Version: FDS 6.0.1; MPI Enabled; OpenMP Disabled
SVN Revision No. : 17534
This runs in our Linux cluster, compiled using Intel compiler.
Take the evacuation part away (at MISC-namelist, add NO_EVACUATION=.TRUE.)
Try the fire case with MPI.
Process 3 of 6 is running on compute-1-15.local
Process 0 of 6 is running on compute-1-15.local
Process 2 of 6 is running on compute-1-15.local
Process 6 of 6 is running on compute-1-15.local
Process 1 of 6 is running on compute-1-15.local
Process 4 of 6 is running on compute-1-15.local
Process 5 of 6 is running on compute-1-15.local
Mesh 1 is assigned to Process 0
Mesh 2 is assigned to Process 1
EVAC: Emesh 1 EVAC_MESH_1 has 1 door flow fields
Mesh 3 is assigned to Process 2
Mesh 4 is assigned to Process 3
Mesh 5 is assigned to Process 4
Mesh 6 is assigned to Process 5
Mesh 7 is assigned to Process 6
Mesh 8 is assigned to Process 6
Mesh 9 is assigned to Process 6
Mesh 10 is assigned to Process 6
Mesh 11 is assigned to Process 6
Mesh 12 is assigned to Process 6
Mesh 13 is assigned to Process 6
Mesh 14 is assigned to Process 6
EVAC: Emesh 1 EVAC_MESH_1 has 1 door flow fields
EVAC: Emesh 2 EVAC_MESH_2 has 1 door flow fields
EVAC: Emesh 3 EVAC_MESH_3 has 1 door flow fields
EVAC: Emesh 4 EVAC_MESH_4 has 1 door flow fields
EVAC: Emesh 1 EVAC_MESH_1 has 1 door flow fields
EVAC: Emesh 2 EVAC_MESH_2 has 1 door flow fields
EVAC: Emesh 3 EVAC_MESH_3 has 1 door flow fields
EVAC: Emesh 4 EVAC_MESH_4 has 1 door flow fields
EVAC: Emesh 1 EVAC_MESH_1 has 1 door flow fields
EVAC: Emesh 2 EVAC_MESH_2 has 1 door flow fields
EVAC: Emesh 3 EVAC_MESH_3 has 1 door flow fields
EVAC: Emesh 4 EVAC_MESH_4 has 1 door flow fields
EVAC: Emesh 2 EVAC_MESH_2 has 1 door flow fields
EVAC: Emesh 3 EVAC_MESH_3 has 1 door flow fields
EVAC: Emesh 1 EVAC_MESH_1 has 1 door flow fields
EVAC: Emesh 2 EVAC_MESH_2 has 1 door flow fields
EVAC: Emesh 3 EVAC_MESH_3 has 1 door flow fields
EVAC: Emesh 4 EVAC_MESH_4 has 1 door flow fields
EVAC: Emesh 4 EVAC_MESH_4 has 1 door flow fields
EVAC: Emesh 1 EVAC_MESH_1 has 1 door flow fields
EVAC: Emesh 2 EVAC_MESH_2 has 1 door flow fields
EVAC: Emesh 3 EVAC_MESH_3 has 1 door flow fields
EVAC: Emesh 4 EVAC_MESH_4 has 1 door flow fields
EVAC: Emesh 1 EVAC_MESH_1 has 1 door flow fields
EVAC: Emesh 2 EVAC_MESH_2 has 1 door flow fields
EVAC: Emesh 3 EVAC_MESH_3 has 1 door flow fields
EVAC: Emesh 4 EVAC_MESH_4 has 1 door flow fields
Fire Dynamics Simulator
Compilation Date : Tue, 26 Nov 2013
Current Date : April 3, 2014 14:47:48
Version: FDS 6.0.1; MPI Enabled; OpenMP Disabled
SVN Revision No. : 17534
Job TITLE : thesis
Job ID string : fire1
Time Step: -49, Simulation Time: 0.00 s
Time Step: 1, Simulation Time: 0.10 s
Time Step: 2, Simulation Time: 0.20 s
Time Step: 3, Simulation Time: 0.30 s
Time Step: 4, Simulation Time: 0.40 s
Time Step: 5, Simulation Time: 0.50 s
Time Step: 6, Simulation Time: 0.60 s
So, it is running also on our Linux cluster.
Timo
Original issue reported on code.google.com by tkorhon1
on 2014-04-03 11:58:20
Thank you very much for your comments.
The fire part runs just fine. I have been doing some research and it seems to be a
problem with the stack size (or an alike issue) of the cluster here in Lund.
Thanks for the help!
Original issue reported on code.google.com by andres.panagioto
on 2014-04-03 12:17:29
I'll close this issue. Seems to be a computer problem, not a
source code problem. I set the status to "UnVerified", i.e.,
not able to reproduce same error (or any error).
TimoK
Original issue reported on code.google.com by tkorhon1
on 2014-05-09 07:28:36
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
andres.panagioto
on 2014-04-02 12:14:47