Closed gforney closed 9 years ago
Please attach the input file to this issue. You can do so by going to the issue
using the link in the email update you received and clicking in the add a comment
text box. You will then get a link to attach a file.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by drjfloyd
on 2007-12-03 21:11:56
Please try the attached binary...
Original issue reported on code.google.com by bryanwklein
on 2007-12-03 21:55:00
Fire Dynamics Simulator (fds5_osx_intel_64)
Compilation Date : Thu, 29 Nov 2007
Version : 5.0.2 Serial
SVN Revision No. : 1037
Operating System : Mac OS X 10.5.1 (9B18), Darwin 9.1.0
I tried the new 64-bit binary over the weekend using 3 variants of my input file.
1) 2,764,800 cells (single mesh), still running (timestep 14500)
2) 1,382,400 cells (mesh1), 1,382,400 cells (mesh2), segmentation fault after
timestamp 1100
3) 777,600 cells (mesh1), 1,536,000 cells (mesh2), segmentation fault after timestamp
900
For all cases, Activity Monitor showed 1 thread, ~2 GB real memory, ~5GB virtual memory.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by john.e.brooker@nasa.gov
on 2007-12-10 16:17:23
Try attached 32bit versions.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by bryanwklein
on 2007-12-10 22:29:25
Fire Dynamics Simulator (fds_osx_intel)
Compilation Date : Wed, 05 Dec 2007
Version : 5.0.3 Serial
SVN Revision No. : 1068
The new 32 bit build, with the updated Intel compiler, appears to be working for case
1 from above (time step 3800). I will need your help compiling MPI in order to test
the 32 bit parallel build.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by john.e.brooker@nasa.gov
on 2007-12-11 20:18:32
Some interesting stats comparing 64 bit (5.0.2 Serial, 1037) and 32 bit (5.0.3
Serial, 1068) for case1.
Time Step 1 December 7, 2007 17:25:05
----------------------------------------------
CPU/step: 11.782 s, Total CPU: 11.78 s
Time step: 0.02011 s, Total time: 0.02 s
Max CFL number: 0.19E-01 at ( 76, 87, 65)
Max divergence: 0.67E-15 at ( 70, 54,159)
Min divergence: -0.67E-15 at ( 72,136, 14)
Time Step 7200 December 9, 2007 02:19:42
----------------------------------------------
CPU/step: 12.047 s, Total CPU: 24.68 hr
Time step: 0.00135 s, Total time: 10.33 s
Max CFL number: 0.98E+00 at ( 66, 44,130)
Max divergence: 0.55E+01 at ( 24,119, 72)
Min divergence: -0.10E+02 at ( 19,122, 72)
No. of Lagrangian Particles: 818
Total Heat Release Rate: 2.003 kW
Radiation Loss to Boundaries: 1.189 kW
Time Step 1 December 10, 2007 18:16:25
----------------------------------------------
CPU/step: 15.834 s, Total CPU: 15.83 s
Time step: 0.02011 s, Total time: 0.02 s
Max CFL number: 0.19E-01 at ( 76, 87, 65)
Max divergence: 0.67E-15 at ( 70, 54,159)
Min divergence: -0.67E-15 at ( 72,136, 14)
Time Step 7200 December 12, 2007 10:06:54
----------------------------------------------
CPU/step: 15.575 s, Total CPU: 30.96 hr
Time step: 0.00135 s, Total time: 10.33 s
Max CFL number: 0.98E+00 at ( 79, 40,110)
Max divergence: 0.12E+02 at ( 16,126, 72)
Min divergence: -0.53E+01 at ( 16,131, 72)
No. of Lagrangian Particles: 833
Total Heat Release Rate: 2.552 kW
Radiation Loss to Boundaries: 1.512 kW
Original issue reported on code.google.com by john.e.brooker@nasa.gov
on 2007-12-12 20:34:12
Please try the new 5.1.0 release, it includes both 32 and 64 bit versions.
I am not sure how well 64bit MPI version is working, please start a seperate thread
if it does not work.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by bryanwklein
on 2008-01-08 22:49:04
I would like to try the 32/64 bit MPI versions, although I am not entirely clear how
to do this on a multi-core
machine. Please advise.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by john.e.brooker@nasa.gov
on 2008-01-09 21:45:58
I will put together a write up for this process and post it as a Wiki when it is
finished. I will also notify you through this issue posting.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by bryanwklein
on 2008-01-15 12:31:28
A follow-up to Comment 7. I tried the new 32/64 bit 5.1.0 release using case 1 (see
Comment 3) with the
following results.
Fire Dynamics Simulator (fds_osx_intel_32)
Compilation Date : Tue, 08 Jan 2008
Version : 5.1.0 Serial
SVN Revision No. : 1162
Time step 6979, 10s, successful
Fire Dynamics Simulator (fds_osx_intel_64)
Compilation Date : Tue, 08 Jan 2008
Version : 5.1.0 Serial
SVN Revision No. : 1162
Time step 600, 1.41s, error (174) segmentation fault
Not sure why the previous 64 bit build worked (see comment 3) and this one didn't.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by john.e.brooker@nasa.gov
on 2008-01-24 16:49:57
Have you tried the 5.1.1 version posted yesterday?
Please confirm that you get the Seg Fault with this one as well.
-Bryan
Original issue reported on code.google.com by ZivBK1
on 2008-01-24 21:08:38
I tried the new 64 bit 5.1.1 release using case 1 (see Comment 3) with the following
results.
Fire Dynamics Simulator (fds_osx_intel_64)
Compilation Date : Mon, 21 Jan 2008
Version : 5.1.1 Serial
SVN Revision No. : 1217
Time step 600, 1.41s, error (174) segmentation fault
Original issue reported on code.google.com by john.e.brooker@nasa.gov
on 2008-01-28 16:33:22
What is the status of this thread?
Original issue reported on code.google.com by mcgratta
on 2008-07-22 20:44:04
We will retry with 5.2 release and latest versions of Intel compilers.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by ZivBK1
on 2008-07-22 21:12:27
(No text was entered with this change)
Original issue reported on code.google.com by bryanwklein
on 2008-08-28 17:06:34
I got similar errors on my Linux-Workstation (2*QuadCore) with a self-compiled
version of fds (releases of 5.1.6 to present). As far as I now now, the compiler
options are the key to this error... I recompiled fds 5.2.1 with additional options
and one case is running for much longer than ever.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by simon.frey@hbi.ch
on 2008-10-14 06:16:49
I got similar errors on my Linux-Workstation (2*QuadCore) with a self-compiled
version of fds (releases of 5.1.6 to present). As far as I now now, the compiler
options are the key to this error... I recompiled fds with additional compiler
options and the first test-case is still running...
Please see http://code.google.com/p/fds-smv/issues/detail?id=474
Original issue reported on code.google.com by simon.frey@hbi.ch
on 2008-10-14 09:17:44
Thank you for the tip... I am testing this flag out with the 64bit OS X builds and
hopefully it will help there too.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by bryanwklein
on 2008-10-22 00:02:09
Could you manage to fix your problem?
Original issue reported on code.google.com by simon.frey@hbi.ch
on 2008-10-24 11:41:22
bryan will respond when he gets back to the office which should be sometime the week
of november 3rd
Original issue reported on code.google.com by gforney
on 2008-10-24 11:53:54
Bryan and I worked on this issue Wednesday (10/22/08) from our homes using iChat. He
guided me through the process of compiling OpenMP with the inclusion of gfortran. We
still had more to do, but it was late so we stopped for the night. I noticed an email
(home address) this morning that had an attachment which included the remaining
libraries and binaries necessary for 64 bit parallel fds. He said it worked for him
using my input file with 4 meshes. I will try it out this weekend and report back.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by john.e.brooker@nasa.gov
on 2008-10-24 18:21:33
I am back again and will be looking into the newest errors.
John, can you post them here just to keep track for others who may encounter this issue.
-Bryan
Original issue reported on code.google.com by bryanwklein
on 2008-11-03 21:32:29
Will contact again for further troubleshooting.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by bryan%solvercore.com@gtempaccount.com
on 2009-01-26 22:03:38
Closing this Issue based on our conversation.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by bryan%solvercore.com@gtempaccount.com
on 2009-02-05 16:41:23
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
john.e.brooker@nasa.gov
on 2007-12-03 20:40:48