Closed gforney closed 9 years ago
Changed my mind about the crude damping factor. This would likely not work because
you still have a high eddy viscosity near the wall and this affects the strain rate.
The right way to do this is just to add the damping function.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by randy.mcdermott
on 2009-12-17 22:47:12
Jason,
I think the right thing to do here is to store the friction velocity from the WW calc
in a wall array. Would this not also be help for the soot deposition model?
If I have u* then I can compute the damping function in the wall loop in
COMPUTE_VISCOSITY and this should do it.
R
Original issue reported on code.google.com by randy.mcdermott
on 2009-12-17 22:51:14
FYI, the next release of FDS is going to be a minor one (5.5), so if you need to
make a slight change in BL formulation, you can do it now.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by mcgratta
on 2009-12-17 22:51:37
Randy,
Storing it makes sense. Soot makes use of it and no point in computing it twice.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by drjfloyd
on 2009-12-18 04:00:31
Jason,
Storing U_TAU in a wall array is easier said than done, unfortunately, because it is
really computed at edges, which have orientations and we would then need to
interpolate to the face center. For the moment I have added the constant damping
factor back but now it is done in COMPUTE_VISCOSITY so that the velocity field will
also feel the effect. Khalid sent me their implementation. There are a few
deficiencies in their approach.
1. They do not account for the damping factor in the momentum equation, which of
course is important for convection.
2. They compute their 'yplus' from VELCON and MU (the turbulent viscosity), when
strictly speaking this should be computed from TAU_W from WW, which accounts for the
true velocity gradient evaluated at the wall (du/dy)_w and the molecular viscosity.
3. They do not account for the composition and temperature dependence of CP, as you
have done.
So, I think the implementation we have coded up currently should be better. But we
will wait and see how things shake out once they are able to rerun their tests with
the latest code.
R
Original issue reported on code.google.com by randy.mcdermott
on 2009-12-18 15:06:11
Hi Jason and Randy,
I tried to run my case (presented in the draft paper) using fds executable from:
http://code.google.com/p/fds-smv/downloads/list
(SVN 5414). I set H_EDDY=T on MISC as per your suggestion.
However, I got some error message which is shown in the attached file. I will
appreciate it if you kindly comment on this.
Regards,
Khalid
Original issue reported on code.google.com by khalid.moinuddin@vu.edu.au
on 2010-01-08 04:39:00
Khalid,
Please attach your FDS input file.
Thanks.
Randy
Original issue reported on code.google.com by randy.mcdermott
on 2010-01-08 13:36:56
Sorry Randy, I missed your message. Please find the attached file.
Regards,
Khalid
Original issue reported on code.google.com by khalid.moinuddin@vu.edu.au
on 2010-01-20 05:35:36
The code is choking on the line (in the HEAT_TRANSFER_COEFFICIENT function)
YY_GET = YYP(IIG,JJG,KKG,:)
because we pass IIG=-1, JJG=-1, KKG=-1 on Line 862 of wall.f90 (SF%BACKING=VOID).
Kevin said he would take a look.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by randy.mcdermott
on 2010-01-20 14:42:03
I just added
IF (H_EDDY .AND. IIG>=0) THEN
There are special cases where the back surface of a wall is set to a certain
temperature, in which we want to compute a heat transfer coefficient to account for
convective loss off the back side.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by mcgratta
on 2010-01-20 14:59:57
Okay. Now seems to work fine for me, though I am not quite convinced this is the
solution we want. Are we happy using the old HTC on the back side for that special
case? Because that is what this change reverts to.
Khalid, can you please check the latest code and verify that this is working for you?
Thanks!
Original issue reported on code.google.com by randy.mcdermott
on 2010-01-20 16:49:29
The fact that we have no info about the back side other than a surface temperature
limits what we can do. The HTC just reverts back to its simplest form.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by mcgratta
on 2010-01-20 16:53:17
Hi Randy,
Last time I downloaded win32 executable installer from FDS downloads
http://code.google.com/p/fds-smv/downloads/list
Is there any win32 executable available with the latest code?
Kind regards,
Khalid
Original issue reported on code.google.com by khalid.moinuddin@vu.edu.au
on 2010-01-20 22:01:24
http://fds-smv.googlecode.com/files/fds5_SVN5462_Win32_test.exe
Khalid,
I just posted this as deprecated. Let me know if you have any problems.
Cheers,
Randy
Original issue reported on code.google.com by randy.mcdermott
on 2010-01-20 22:12:09
Thanks, Rnady.
The case is running. I will contact you once the run is complete.
Regards,
Khalid
Original issue reported on code.google.com by khalid.moinuddin@vu.edu.au
on 2010-01-22 02:44:15
Jason,
I just made a few major changes. When you get time could you have a look and see if
you approve?
1. I rearranged HEAT_TRANSFER_COEFFICIENT and made calls to WW to calc friction
velocity. So, now you have U_TAU(IW), the friction velocity, as a wall array.
Hopefully this will be useful for soot deposition.
2. I added Van Driest damping (easy now that we have U_TAU) to the viscosity near the
wall. Now, H_EDDY should actually be working correctly.
Khalid, please run your test case with the latest code.
Thanks.
R
Original issue reported on code.google.com by randy.mcdermott
on 2010-02-17 23:56:03
H_EDDY removed from source. No verification.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by randy.mcdermott
on 2011-08-26 19:52:25
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
randy.mcdermott
on 2009-12-17 22:28:08