fisharebest / webtrees

Online genealogy
https://webtrees.net
GNU General Public License v3.0
490 stars 301 forks source link

[Feature][enhancement] Citations as specific "objects" #5006

Closed chtiland closed 2 months ago

chtiland commented 4 months ago

Hello

Since "proofs" on an event or a fact comes from the "Citation" of a "Source" (witch is "stored" in a repository), it would be nice to to consider them as specific "object" linked to "Source", because a citation of a source is often the same for many events.

Example (in french) :

In "Acte de mariage de DUPONT X MARCHAND" we found (in braces events that should be attached to the same citation):

This citation could be "attached" to more than 20 events.

I took a marriage as an example, but it also happens with many kind of documents :

So when, later, adding any information about a citation, (eg. : enter TEXT, not NOTE, from the digital version of the document, or its translation) would require only one modification, and not as much as there are event linked to "Source".

Or do I missed something about Citations in Webtrees ?

fisharebest commented 4 months ago

This is a good idea - but it is not part of the GEDCOM specification.

It has been discussed for inclusion in a future version. e.g. https://github.com/FamilySearch/GEDCOM/issues/455

When it is part of the standard, I will include it in webtrees.

Norwegian-Sardines commented 4 months ago

Until GEDCOM normalizes the Source_Citation someone could write a module that adds a citation to a set of specific INDI. tags!

chtiland commented 2 months ago

Not in GEDCOM specs... but Gramps does it (and probably other software), and Gramps Web too... so I no longer use Webtrees.

Norwegian-Sardines commented 2 months ago

Not in GEDCOM specs... but Gramps does it (and probably other software), and Gramps Web too... so I no longer use Webtrees.

Enjoy your use of Gramps.

fisharebest commented 2 months ago

I agree this would be useful.

The GEDCOM maintainers are considering this - https://github.com/FamilySearch/GEDCOM/issues/348

When a they define the structure, I will add support for it. Until then, I'm afraid this is a won't-fix.