@fivetran-kristin I've started the backwards compatibility work here for ease. (I'll move it over once we're happy with the structure.)
The only one I'm worried about is the app_link table. From the data Manju sent, I was able to get most of the columns, but there are three that I'm still unclear on: class_name, package_name, and template_page. I'm hoping they are just not in the JSON he sent as an example, but I've asked him to confirm here.
This PR is compatible with this PR in the transform package.
@fivetran-kristin I've started the backwards compatibility work here for ease. (I'll move it over once we're happy with the structure.)
The only one I'm worried about is the
app_linktable. From the data Manju sent, I was able to get most of the columns, but there are three that I'm still unclear on:class_name,package_name, andtemplate_page. I'm hoping they are just not in the JSON he sent as an example, but I've asked him to confirm here.This PR is compatible with this PR in the transform package.