Release/v0.8.0

[fivetran-catfritz]

PR Overview

This PR will address the following Issue/Feature:

• 30

• 38

• https://github.com/fivetran/dbt_github/issues/47

This PR will result in the following new package version:

• v0.8.0: breaking due to schema changes

Please detail what change(s) this PR introduces and any additional information that should be known during the review of this PR:

🚨 Breaking Change 🚨

• For consistency with other Fivetran packages, added default target schemas in dbt_project.yml. This is a breaking change since the model outputs will now be stored in a schema called <your target schema>_github by default. You will need to update any of your downstream use cases to point to the new schema.
  • Refer to the Change the Build Schema section of the README for instructions on how to adjust the output schema.

Under the Hood:

• Updated the maintainer PR template to the current format.
• Incorporated the new fivetran_utils.drop_schemas_automation macro into the end of each Buildkite integration test job. (PR #49)
• Updated the quickstart.yml file to allow for automated Quickstart data model deployments. (PR #51)

PR Checklist

Basic Validation

Please acknowledge that you have successfully performed the following commands locally:

• [x] dbt run –full-refresh && dbt test
• [x] dbt run (if incremental models are present) && dbt test

Before marking this PR as "ready for review" the following have been applied:

• [x] The appropriate issue has been linked, tagged, and properly assigned
• [x] All necessary documentation and version upgrades have been applied
• [x] docs were regenerated (unless this PR does not include any code or yml updates)
• [x] BuildKite integration tests are passing
• [x] Detailed validation steps have been provided below

Detailed Validation

Please share any and all of your validation steps:

• <user's schema>_github_source schema created correctly:

• created_at column brought successfully into model stg_github__issue_comment.

If you had to summarize this PR in an emoji, which would it be?

:dancer: