Closed jamienewcomb closed 1 year ago
Hi @jamienewcomb can you confirm that in the source table for jira.user
those fields do not look like that? The int_jira__issue_users
model (which I believe is what you are querying from) populates these fields by performing a join on the source table.
https://github.com/fivetran/dbt_jira/blob/78c49634ffa891b376eb2b1c2675d6a3ba3867ce/models/intermediate/int_jira__issue_users.sql#L29-L43
I wouldn't believe this should cause any data quality issues, but curious to see what you say it looks like at the source.
@fivetran-joemarkiewicz Yeah the source table JIRA_USER
looks like this aswell.
Feels odd that all the personal information is jumbled up but the surrounding fields are absolutely fine with the correct info. The user IDs are all correct aswell
Could Atlassian have done something here - which is what I am thinking
Hi @jamienewcomb this may be a result of Snowflake column level hashing based on role permissions. You Snowflake admin may have restricted access to those columns based on the permissions of the role you are using.
I would reach out to your Snowflake admin and see if this is the case.
Thanks @fivetran-joemarkiewicz - that would make alot of sense. this feels like a me issue so gonna close for now while I check that and will reopen if we feel there is something else wrong
Is there an existing issue for this?
Describe the issue
This does not look right to me. Don't think this is a me issue but do say if it is
Relevant error log or model output
No response
Expected behavior
Would expect to see the information aligned to the column names
dbt Project configurations
-
Package versions
-
What database are you using dbt with?
snowflake
dbt Version
-
Additional Context
No response
Are you willing to open a PR to help address this issue?