Closed fivetran-reneeli closed 1 year ago
Thanks for the review @fivetran-catfritz! -- update: actually, after talking with Joe, I think we should keep the materialization as a table because view would not solve the compute issue. Though i'm working through how to avoid having the duplicate tables, gonna see what happens if we just move what we had in the int model to the final daily overview model
Are you a current Fivetran customer?
Internal What change(s) does this PR introduce?
running_total
model to alleviate runtime errors resulting from the daily_overview model exceeding disc capacity upon running. Did you update the CHANGELOG?Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Did you update the dbt_project.yml files with the version upgrade (please leverage standard semantic versioning)? (In both your main project and integration_tests)
Is this PR in response to a previously created Bug or Feature Request
How did you test the PR changes?
Select which warehouse(s) were used to test the PR
Provide an emoji that best describes your current mood
:dancer: **Feedback** We are so excited you decided to contribute to the Fivetran community dbt package! We continue to work to improve the packages and would greatly appreciate your [feedback](https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/DQ7K7WW) on our existing dbt packages or what you'd like to see next.