Closed NiuKeke closed 5 years ago
@NiuKeke
Thank you for letting us know this issue.
We tested sub-pixel function via sample/reprojection (https://github.com/fixstars/libSGM/issues/21#issuecomment-437252144) and KITTI benchmark. Could you provide a case that cause a result incorrect?
Notice that disparity value will be multiplied StereoSGM::SUBPIXEL_SCALE
if sub-pixel parameter is set true
(i.e. disparity value is going to have 4 fixed point fractional bits).
https://github.com/fixstars/libSGM/blob/707e28b3ee013851abc5220bcb303cccceb88ee5/include/libsgm.h#L122-L125
Sincerely,
@NiuKeke Thank you for letting us know this issue. We tested sub-pixel function via sample/reprojection (#21 (comment)) and KITTI benchmark. Could you provide a case that cause a result incorrect? Notice that disparity value will be multiplied StereoSGM::SUBPIXEL_SCALE if sub-pixel parameter is set true (i.e. disparity value is going to have 4 fixed point fractional bits).
libSGM/include/libsgm.h Lines 122 to 125 in 707e28b * @attention * You need to allocate dst memory at least width x height x sizeof(element_type) bytes. * The element_type is uint8_t for output_depth_bits == 8 and uint16_t for output_depth_bits == 16. * Note that dst element value would be multiplied StereoSGM::SUBPIXEL_SCALE if subpixel option was enabled.
Sincerely,
I got it .Sorry,I just missed the StereoSGM::SUBPIXEL_SCALE.
Congrats.
I will close this issue. If you are faced with anything related this issue, reopen it.
Congrats. I will close this issue. If you are faced with anything related this issue, reopen it.
Ok,thank you very much.
Why is it incorrect when it comes to SUBPixel Mode? When the SUBPIXEL Parameter was set to true,the result disparity image value is incorrect .Did I miss something?