Open tothimre-zz opened 5 years ago
Hey.
Sorry for the slow response, I'm quite busy with another project and didn't saw this pull request.
I was reading the changes you made here and they look quite...redundant, I mean, you're avoiding totally the use of else
blocks (which are quite readable already in my opinion) and adding a lot of redundant checks that just don't feel....right (I mean, they are exactly what the else
blocks already check itself, and in your code it is totally unnecessary).
Just to mention an example, if isItProtected
is true, you already return the item
just when it enters the if
block in line 68, so you don't need to check again if isItProtected
is false (by using !isItProtected
, obviously) in the lines below because it is already obviously false
.
Right now, I don't see a good reason to accept this pull request. I could say that you can just avoid a lot of if
and else
blocks by doing something similar to Pimple's get
implementation, which does a lot of checks on the first if
and doesn't use else
blocks too..So feel free to update your approach if you want.
Anyway, thanks for the pull request, and I hope the review is good enough for you and that I explained the point well.
The code is easier to read, for further contribution.