execute_python_code causes crashes

[fjrdomingues]

⚠️ Search for existing issues first ⚠️

• [x] I have searched the existing issues, and there is no existing issue for my problem

Which Operating System are you using?

Linux

Which version of AutoGPT are you using?

Master (branch)

Do you use OpenAI GPT-3 or GPT-4?

GPT-4

Which area covers your issue best?

Commands

Describe your issue.

While running autogpt, it needs to access files. However it makes mistakes at times. It seems that when running execute_python_code, a simple error like file not found can cause an error.

Upload Activity Log Content

No response

Upload Error Log Content

2023-11-22 23:28:54,650 INFO NEXT ACTION: COMMAND = execute_python_code ARGUMENTS = {'code': "import os\n\nsource = 'sitev2/content/faqs/redo/00-redo-cancel-subscription.md'\ndestination = 'sitev2/content/faqs/00-subscription-cancellation-overview.md'\n\n# Rename and move the updated FAQ file to the main 'faq' folder\nos.rename(source, destination)"}

2023-11-22 23:28:54,654 INFO Executing python file '/home/sam/Documents/AutoGPT/autogpts/autogpt/data/agents/SEOFAQGPT-ecebe449/workspace/tmpmkvcz15_.py' in working directory '/home/sam/Documents/AutoGPT/autogpts/autogpt/data/agents/SEOFAQGPT-ecebe449/workspace' 2023-11-22 23:28:55,201 INFO SYSTEM: Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 198, in _run_module_as_main File "", line 88, in _run_code File "/home/sam/Documents/AutoGPT/autogpts/autogpt/autogpt/main.py", line 5, in autogpt.app.cli.cli() File "/home/sam/venv/autogpt/lib/python3.11/site-packages/click/core.py", line 1157, in call return self.main(args, kwargs) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/home/sam/venv/autogpt/lib/python3.11/site-packages/click/core.py", line 1078, in main rv = self.invoke(ctx) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/home/sam/venv/autogpt/lib/python3.11/site-packages/click/core.py", line 1688, in invoke return _process_result(sub_ctx.command.invoke(sub_ctx)) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/home/sam/venv/autogpt/lib/python3.11/site-packages/click/core.py", line 1434, in invoke return ctx.invoke(self.callback, ctx.params) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/home/sam/venv/autogpt/lib/python3.11/site-packages/click/core.py", line 783, in invoke return __callback(args, *kwargs) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/home/sam/Documents/AutoGPT/autogpts/autogpt/autogpt/app/cli.py", line 159, in run run_auto_gpt( File "/home/sam/Documents/AutoGPT/autogpts/autogpt/autogpt/core/runner/client_lib/utils.py", line 59, in wrapper return asyncio.run(f(args, **kwargs)) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/usr/lib/python3.11/asyncio/runners.py", line 190, in run return runner.run(main) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/usr/lib/python3.11/asyncio/runners.py", line 118, in run return self._loop.run_until_complete(task) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/usr/lib/python3.11/asyncio/base_events.py", line 653, in run_until_complete return future.result() ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/home/sam/Documents/AutoGPT/autogpts/autogpt/autogpt/app/main.py", line 271, in run_auto_gpt await run_interaction_loop(agent) File "/home/sam/Documents/AutoGPT/autogpts/autogpt/autogpt/app/main.py", line 467, in run_interaction_loop ) = await agent.propose_action() ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/home/sam/Documents/AutoGPT/autogpts/autogpt/autogpt/agents/features/watchdog.py", line 36, in propose_action command_name, command_args, thoughts = await super( ^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/home/sam/Documents/AutoGPT/autogpts/autogpt/autogpt/agents/base.py", line 249, in propose_action prompt: ChatPrompt = self.build_prompt(scratchpad=self._prompt_scratchpad) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/home/sam/Documents/AutoGPT/autogpts/autogpt/autogpt/agents/agent.py", line 146, in build_prompt return super().build_prompt( ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/home/sam/Documents/AutoGPT/autogpts/autogpt/autogpt/agents/features/context.py", line 64, in build_prompt + self.context.format_numbered() ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/home/sam/Documents/AutoGPT/autogpts/autogpt/autogpt/agents/features/context.py", line 36, in format_numbered return "\n\n".join([f"{i}. {c.fmt()}" for i, c in enumerate(self.items, 1)]) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/home/sam/Documents/AutoGPT/autogpts/autogpt/autogpt/agents/features/context.py", line 36, in return "\n\n".join([f"{i}. {c.fmt()}" for i, c in enumerate(self.items, 1)]) ^^^^^^^ File "/home/sam/Documents/AutoGPT/autogpts/autogpt/autogpt/models/context_item.py", line 36, in fmt f"{self.content}\n" ^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/home/sam/Documents/AutoGPT/autogpts/autogpt/autogpt/models/context_item.py", line 59, in content return read_textual_file(self.file_path, logger) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/home/sam/Documents/AutoGPT/autogpts/autogpt/autogpt/commands/file_operations_utils.py", line 154, in read_textual_file raise FileNotFoundError( FileNotFoundError: read_file /home/sam/Documents/AutoGPT/autogpts/autogpt/data/agents/SEOFAQGPT-ecebe449/workspace/sitev2/content/faqs/redo/00-redo-cancel-subscription.md failed: no such file or directory

@autopilot

[codeautopilot[bot]]

Potential solution

The plan to solve the bug involves ensuring that the file operations, specifically renaming and moving files, are handled with proper error checking and exception handling. The solution should prevent the application from crashing when a file is not found and instead provide a clear error message to the user. The error handling should be implemented in the part of the codebase that deals with file operations, which may involve modifying existing code or adding new functionality.

What is causing this bug?

The bug is caused by an attempt to rename a file that does not exist, as indicated by the FileNotFoundError in the error log. The execute_python_code command is executing a Python script that tries to rename a file without first checking if the file exists. When the file is not found, the application raises an unhandled FileNotFoundError, leading to a crash.

Code

To address the issue, we need to implement error checking in the Python script that is being executed by the execute_python_code command. The script should check if the source file exists before attempting to rename it. Additionally, the execute_python_code function should handle exceptions more gracefully, logging the original exception and providing a clear error message to the user.

Here's a code snippet that could be used in the Python script to check for the file's existence before renaming:

import os

source = 'sitev2/content/faqs/redo/00-redo-cancel-subscription.md'
destination = 'sitev2/content/faqs/00-subscription-cancellation-overview.md'

# Check if the source file exists before renaming
if os.path.isfile(source):
    # Rename and move the updated FAQ file to the main 'faq' folder
    os.rename(source, destination)
else:
    print(f"Error: The file '{source}' does not exist and cannot be renamed.")

Additionally, the execute_python_code function in autogpts/autogpt/autogpt/commands/execute_code.py should be modified to log the original exception details before raising a CommandExecutionError.

How to replicate the bug

To replicate the bug, run the execute_python_code command with a Python script that attempts to rename a non-existent file. The error log provided in the user's ticket can be used to replicate the exact scenario, where the source file path is sitev2/content/faqs/redo/00-redo-cancel-subscription.md and the destination file path is sitev2/content/faqs/00-subscription-cancellation-overview.md.

Task

The task is to modify the execute_python_code function to handle exceptions more gracefully and to ensure that the Python script executed by this function includes proper error checking for file existence before performing file operations. This will prevent the application from crashing and provide a better user experience by informing the user of the specific issue when a file operation fails.

Click here to create a Pull Request with the proposed solution

Files used for this task:

Changes on autogpts/autogpt/autogpt/core/ability/builtins/file_operations.py

Upon reviewing the `file_operations.py` file, it appears that the `ReadFile` and `WriteFile` classes are designed to handle file operations within the AutoGPT framework. The `ReadFile` class includes a `_check_preconditions` method that checks if the file exists and is a file before attempting to read it. This is in line with the task at hand, which is to implement error checking to ensure the source file exists before attempting to rename or move it. However, there is no class or method in this file that directly handles renaming or moving files. The `ReadFile` and `WriteFile` classes are focused on reading from and writing to files, respectively. The error reported by the user seems to be related to a file rename operation, which is not covered by the code in this file. To address the user's issue, we would need to implement a new class or method that specifically handles file renaming and moving operations, including the necessary error checking and exception handling. This new method should: 1. Check if the source file exists before attempting to rename or move it. 2. Provide a clear and user-friendly error message if the file does not exist. 3. Ensure that the application does not crash when a file is not found, but instead handles the exception gracefully. Since the `file_operations.py` file does not currently contain functionality for renaming or moving files, the bug fix would involve adding new code to this file or identifying another part of the codebase where such functionality is implemented and ensuring that proper error checking and exception handling are in place there. In summary, the `file_operations.py` file is not directly relevant to the bug described by the user, as it does not contain code for renaming or moving files. The solution to the bug would involve implementing new functionality or modifying existing code elsewhere in the codebase to handle file renaming/moving operations with appropriate error checking and exception handling.

Changes on autogpts/autogpt/autogpt/commands/execute_code.py

After reviewing the `execute_code.py` file, the following observations and suggestions can be made regarding the handling of exceptions during file operations: 1. **Exception Handling in `execute_python_code` Function:** The `execute_python_code` function writes the provided code to a temporary file and then attempts to execute it. If an exception occurs, it is caught and re-raised as a `CommandExecutionError`. This is a good practice as it provides a more specific error to the caller. However, the original traceback is lost, which might make debugging more difficult. It would be beneficial to log the original exception before raising the new one. 2. **Exception Handling in `execute_python_file` Function:** The `execute_python_file` function checks if the file exists and raises a `FileNotFoundError` if it does not. This is a good practice as it provides immediate feedback to the user when a file is missing. However, the function also catches `DockerException` and raises a `CommandExecutionError`. It would be helpful to log the original exception details for debugging purposes. 3. **Error Messages and User Feedback:** The error messages provided to the user are informative and mimic command-line responses, which can be helpful for users familiar with command-line operations. However, it might be beneficial to include suggestions for resolving the error, such as checking the file path or ensuring the file exists. 4. **Logging:** The file includes logging statements that provide information about the execution flow. This is useful for understanding what the code is doing and can assist in debugging. It is important to ensure that these logs are detailed enough to diagnose issues when they arise. 5. **Docker Container Execution:** The code executes Python files within a Docker container if AutoGPT is not running in a Docker container itself. This adds a layer of isolation and can prevent many issues related to the environment. However, if there are issues with Docker (e.g., Docker not installed, permissions issues), the user is informed, but the error handling could be improved by providing more detailed guidance or alternative solutions. 6. **Shell Command Execution:** The `execute_shell` and `execute_shell_popen` functions include checks to validate the command against an allowlist or denylist, which is a good security practice. However, the error handling for invalid commands could be improved by providing more specific feedback on why the command is not allowed. In summary, the file has a decent structure for handling exceptions and providing feedback to the user. To further improve the robustness and user experience, it would be beneficial to enhance the logging of original exceptions, provide more detailed user guidance on error resolution, and ensure that the error messages are as informative and actionable as possible.

Changes on autogpts/autogpt/autogpt/core/workspace/simple.py

After reviewing the provided source code for `autogpts/autogpt/autogpt/core/workspace/simple.py`, it appears that this file is responsible for managing the workspace configuration and paths for the AutoGPT application. The `SimpleWorkspace` class provides methods to resolve and sanitize paths within the workspace, ensuring that file operations are restricted to the workspace's directory structure. The `get_path` method is particularly relevant as it resolves a given relative path within the workspace and ensures that the path is restricted to the workspace if the `restrict_to_workspace` configuration is set to `True`. This method also includes a check for null bytes in paths, which is important for security reasons. The `setup_workspace` static method is used to create the workspace directory structure and save the agent settings to a JSON file within the workspace. It ensures that the workspace directories are created if they do not exist and that the paths are resolved correctly. Based on the issue described by the user, the problem seems to be related to file operations, specifically renaming a file that does not exist. The `SimpleWorkspace` class does not directly handle file operations like renaming or moving files; it is more focused on path resolution and workspace setup. However, the `get_path` method could be indirectly related to the issue if it is used to resolve the paths for the files that are being renamed or moved. If the paths are not being resolved correctly or if the `restrict_to_workspace` configuration is not being honored, it could lead to attempts to access files outside of the intended workspace, which could cause errors. In conclusion, while the `SimpleWorkspace` class is responsible for path resolution and workspace configuration, it does not directly handle file operations. The issue described by the user seems to be more closely related to the actual file operation (renaming/moving files) rather than the workspace setup. Therefore, the bug might be more directly addressed in the file operations code, which is likely to be found in the `file_operations.py` file mentioned in the plan. It would be important to ensure that the paths provided to the file operations are correctly resolved by `SimpleWorkspace` and that any file operations respect the workspace restrictions.

_Disclaimer: This comment was entirely generated using AI. Be aware that the information provided may be incorrect._ Current plan usage: 65.74% **Have feedback or need help?** [Discord](https://discord.gg/r72ykfvyx7) [Documentation](https://docs.codeautopilot.com/) [support@codeautopilot.com](mailto:support@codeautopilot.com)

[github-actions[bot]]

This issue has automatically been marked as stale because it has not had any activity in the last 50 days. You can unstale it by commenting or removing the label. Otherwise, this issue will be closed in 10 days.