Closed fjuniorr closed 9 months ago
I agree. And since I did not specify which information should be logged, it doesn't really help.
I've added the function name to the mapping entry in https://github.com/fjuniorr/flowmapper/commit/d520348cd676650255326ae4a13b05d55daebc4b and have left the comment as is for now.
I'm considering closing this and opening issues when specific information needs appear. Sounds good, @cmutel?
@fjuniorr Can we close this?
Yes!
I think this is poorly worded - instead of logging to a separate file, we can treat the mapping object as a log itself. Then instead of (or probably in addition to) the comment field we include a separate field stating which function or combination of functions produced the mapping object.