Hi fkodom,
I was trying to experiment with your fftconv implementation but I saw that just after 2 layers the error becomes quite large. Is it due to a malinterpretation of your code from my part? Might it be that the FFT + IFFT simply introduce too much error when concatenated?
Thank you in advance for your help! :)
David
SOLUTION:
The problem is that the convolution was growing very largely, for which a difference of 1e-3 was not that big. In short the method works fantastically good :)
Hi fkodom, I was trying to experiment with your fftconv implementation but I saw that just after 2 layers the error becomes quite large. Is it due to a malinterpretation of your code from my part? Might it be that the FFT + IFFT simply introduce too much error when concatenated?
Thank you in advance for your help! :) David
SOLUTION: The problem is that the convolution was growing very largely, for which a difference of 1e-3 was not that big. In short the method works fantastically good :)