Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago
The files created by libwebm and ffmpeg are identical for Opus.
> but libwebm for Audio can not use simple blocks
Can you please explain what you mean by this? libwebm uses SimpleBlock for opus
audio samples except for the last one (because of discard padding).
Original comment by vigne...@google.com
on 13 Jul 2015 at 6:46
Original comment by vigne...@google.com
on 13 Jul 2015 at 6:46
I've attached two files.
vlc_fail.webm - file created before fix with duration. In my case this file are not identical with ffmpeg.
vlc_success.webm - file created after fix with duration. Also this file really identical with opus crated by ffmpeg.
Please compare:
mkvinfo --verbose ./vlc_fail.webm
mkvinfo --verbose ./vlc_success.webm
Original comment by AndreyAl...@gmail.com
on 14 Jul 2015 at 6:53
Attachments:
[deleted comment]
I've attached the result of operations:
mkvinfo --verbose ./vlc_fail.webm > vlc_fail.log
mkvinfo --verbose ./vlc_success.webm > vlc_success.log
vlc_fail:
|+ Cluster
| + Cluster timecode: 0.000s
| + Block group
| + Block (track number 1, 1 frame(s), timecode 0.000s = 00:00:00.000)
| + Frame with size 76
| + Block duration: 20.000000ms
| + Block group
| + Block (track number 1, 1 frame(s), timecode 0.020s = 00:00:00.020)
| + Frame with size 77
| + Block duration: 20.000000ms
| + Block group
| + Block (track number 1, 1 frame(s), timecode 0.040s = 00:00:00.040)
| + Frame with size 75
| + Block duration: 20.000000ms
| + Block group
| + Block (track number 1, 1 frame(s), timecode 0.060s = 00:00:00.060)
| + Frame with size 80
| + Block duration: 20.000000ms
vlc_success:
|+ Cluster
| + Cluster timecode: 0.000s
| + SimpleBlock (key, track number 1, 1 frame(s), timecode 0.000s =
00:00:00.000)
| + Frame with size 76
| + SimpleBlock (key, track number 1, 1 frame(s), timecode 0.020s =
00:00:00.020)
| + Frame with size 77
| + SimpleBlock (key, track number 1, 1 frame(s), timecode 0.040s =
00:00:00.040)
| + Frame with size 75
Original comment by AndreyAl...@gmail.com
on 14 Jul 2015 at 7:00
Original comment by ya...@google.com
on 16 Jul 2015 at 10:21
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
AndreyAl...@gmail.com
on 8 Jul 2015 at 2:46