Closed RayJW closed 12 months ago
There were issues in the past, I will test it on top of the runtime update, maybe it improved on recent versions.
I'm using the bridge on wayland for last week or so, haven't had any issues with it's functionality.
I have also been using it for months now and never had any issue. However, I don't use all the functionality, but I don't see a reason why something like multi-account would break from Wayland if everything else is working perfectly fine.
Started test build 65477
Build 65477 successful To test this build, install it from the testing repository:
flatpak install --user https://dl.flathub.org/build-repo/48115/ch.protonmail.protonmail-bridge.flatpakref
I tested it and besides having weird window decorations it works fine. Probably because of https://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/39/ChangeSet#No_custom_Qt_theming_for_Fedora_Workstation.
I noticed that too, but that's expected since Gnome went with the weird decision to not support server side window decorations on Wayland. So those are the Proton Bridge client side decorations.
My only hesitation to not merge this just now is not having an idea if upstreams considers the app to be Wayland ready.
I just checked the repo and they fixed multiple issues people had with Wayland without ever saying anything about switching to XWayland. So, I think it is considered officially supported, although I couldn't find a reference to that directly anywhere yet.
Started test build 65519
Build 65519 successful To test this build, install it from the testing repository:
flatpak install --user https://dl.flathub.org/build-repo/48159/ch.protonmail.protonmail-bridge.flatpakref
Thanks!
This PR enables the Wayland socket and sets x11 as fallback. I think there isn't really a reason for not doing it. I checked on a device running Wayland and a device running x11 and both work fine with this config with the upside of proper fractional scaling and the many other advantages of using native Wayland.