Closed pietrygamat closed 5 months ago
Started test build 114842
Build 114842 successful To test this build, install it from the testing repository:
flatpak install --user https://dl.flathub.org/build-repo/97656/com.usebruno.Bruno.flatpakref
Started test build 119540
Build 119540 successful To test this build, install it from the testing repository:
flatpak install --user https://dl.flathub.org/build-repo/102387/com.usebruno.Bruno.flatpakref
Started test build 119797
Build 119797 successful To test this build, install it from the testing repository:
flatpak install --user https://dl.flathub.org/build-repo/102651/com.usebruno.Bruno.flatpakref
This appears to have been reverted in Release 1.18.0 #22 and is back to showing the proprietary license badge. If the goal is to have a dual license as the flatpak description
Majority of our features are free and have been opensourced under the MIT license
AND this commit indicate.
Then this license should utilize the expression operators such as AND. This would result in the license being something like <project_license>MIT AND LicenseRef-proprietary=https://usebruno.com/license</project_license>
(I could not find where the actual proprietary license was located to update the link to, so that would need adjustment once identified)
If not, then this change needs to be re-applied such that the license tag is once again <project_license>MIT</project_license>
Flathub entry for bruno has invalid license id.
The open source bruno is released under
MIT
, and notLicenseRef-MIT-
, the entry may be ehnanced with very much inviting with a link to the project website and everything.If I am wrong, however, and the project does not pass the criteria for relase under MIT, reject this PR, but please update the license to valid proprietary license id with url provided:. E.g.
Resulting displaying correct value without halftruth about non-existend license:
resolves #1