Open RobLoach opened 5 months ago
(not saying I'm necessarily in favor of this, but...)
If we're going that route wouldn't com.retroarch.RetroArch
be better?
Easier to not have to remember it's libretro when auto-completing flatpak commands on the shell.
I guess that makes sense. While libretro.com
is the parent organization, the application's main website is retroarch.com
.
Hi,
Renaming app ID is possible with the EOL rebase https://docs.flathub.org/docs/for-app-authors/maintenance/#renaming-the-flatpak-id
On the other hand, com.libretro.RetroArch
is in fact the upstream app ID, so I guess that should be used, even if retroarch.com
exists.
I know we generally don't rename Flathub applications, but can we? :pleading_face: