search

flathub / sm.puri.Chatty

https://flathub.org/apps/details/sm.puri.Chatty
0 stars 1 forks source link

Verify the app #76

Closed AsciiWolf closed 3 days ago

AsciiWolf commented 1 month ago

If possible, please consider verifying this Flatpak.

More information about verified apps: https://flathub.org/about

julianfairfax commented 1 month ago

Hello,

I would love to, but I do not have access to the puri.sm domain and as such cannot do that.

AsciiWolf commented 3 days ago

So, no actual Chatty developers are maintaining this Flatpak?

julianfairfax commented 3 days ago

So, no actual Chatty developers are maintaining this Flatpak?

That's correct. However, I also maintain the development version of the the Flatpak on the Chatty repo. Up to you to consider what that means. The Chatty developers themselves don't maintain any Flatpak manifests.

AsciiWolf commented 2 days ago

So, you have push access to the main Git repo? That should be enough. But the problem is that Chatty still uses the old app namespace even though it got moved to the gnome.org GitLab.

julianfairfax commented 2 days ago

So, you have push access to the main Git repo?

I do not. I make changes with merge requests.

That should be enough.

What for? For claiming I'm an official developer? You could say that if you wanted. For verifying the app it's not enough. It has to be done by the website admins.

But the problem is that Chatty still uses the old app namespace even though it got moved to the gnome.org GitLab.

I don't think that will change for legacy reasons. What is the problem caused by this exactly?

AsciiWolf commented 2 days ago

But the problem is that Chatty still uses the old app namespace even though it got moved to the gnome.org GitLab.

I don't think that will change for legacy reasons. What is the problem caused by this exactly?

@barthalion @nedrichards Can I ask your opinion on this? Thanks!