Closed AsciiWolf closed 3 days ago
Hello,
I would love to, but I do not have access to the puri.sm
domain and as such cannot do that.
So, no actual Chatty developers are maintaining this Flatpak?
So, no actual Chatty developers are maintaining this Flatpak?
That's correct. However, I also maintain the development version of the the Flatpak on the Chatty repo. Up to you to consider what that means. The Chatty developers themselves don't maintain any Flatpak manifests.
So, you have push access to the main Git repo? That should be enough. But the problem is that Chatty still uses the old app namespace even though it got moved to the gnome.org GitLab.
So, you have push access to the main Git repo?
I do not. I make changes with merge requests.
That should be enough.
What for? For claiming I'm an official developer? You could say that if you wanted. For verifying the app it's not enough. It has to be done by the website admins.
But the problem is that Chatty still uses the old app namespace even though it got moved to the gnome.org GitLab.
I don't think that will change for legacy reasons. What is the problem caused by this exactly?
But the problem is that Chatty still uses the old app namespace even though it got moved to the gnome.org GitLab.
I don't think that will change for legacy reasons. What is the problem caused by this exactly?
@barthalion @nedrichards Can I ask your opinion on this? Thanks!
If possible, please consider verifying this Flatpak.
More information about verified apps: https://flathub.org/about