Closed WardBrian closed 1 year ago
Merging #26 (90bcde3) into main (3157c8f) will decrease coverage by
0.09%
. The diff coverage is100.00%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #26 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 98.10% 98.01% -0.09%
==========================================
Files 11 11
Lines 316 302 -14
==========================================
- Hits 310 296 -14
Misses 6 6
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
bayes_kit/__init__.py | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
bayes_kit/autocorr.py | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
bayes_kit/ensemble.py | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
bayes_kit/ess.py | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
bayes_kit/hmc.py | 94.59% <100.00%> (-0.28%) |
:arrow_down: |
bayes_kit/iat.py | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
bayes_kit/mala.py | 93.54% <100.00%> (-0.40%) |
:arrow_down: |
bayes_kit/metropolis.py | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
bayes_kit/rhat.py | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
bayes_kit/smc.py | 95.83% <100.00%> (-0.09%) |
:arrow_down: |
... and 1 more |
:mega: We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more
l 48 warns that the call to scipy.stats.beta.logpdf returns an NDArray not a float
Pylance is lying to you
>>> isinstance(scipy.stats.beta.logpdf(.1, 3, 2), float)
True
(it does return an array if the first argument is an array, but it isn't in this model)
I think I resolved the other pylance warnings, though I'm not sure if they were also spurious
As discussed in #16, this will run
mypy
andblack
against PRs. At the moment it will fail becausemain
doesn't pass these checks, but aftermain
does I will rebase and merge this