@magland
Should we include electrodes location data as a pre-validation step for SI-based sorters?
I just encountered an error during job execution due to a NWB file not having valid electrodes location information, this looks like a cheap validation to make and it would be very helpful.
We could have something similar to what already exists for electrical_series_path, but with electrode_table columns as options for location.
@alejoe91 it looks like in SI nwbextractor this info is hardcoded to be fetched from rel_x , rel_y and rel_z columns. Can we make this flexible?
@magland Should we include electrodes location data as a pre-validation step for SI-based sorters? I just encountered an error during job execution due to a NWB file not having valid electrodes location information, this looks like a cheap validation to make and it would be very helpful.
We could have something similar to what already exists for
electrical_series_path
, but with electrode_table columns as options forlocation
.@alejoe91 it looks like in SI nwbextractor this info is hardcoded to be fetched from
rel_x
,rel_y
andrel_z
columns. Can we make this flexible?