Closed jonathon-love closed 1 month ago
In which way did it generate the sources wrong?
In the case of pikepdf this change results in Deprecated
(package name with capital D) vanishing from the generated sources. I now have to figure out if that should never have been there in the first place or if it is now missing due to the change.
https://github.com/dreua/flatpak-module-qpdf-pikepdf/pull/84/files
I think this is a regression, pikepdf now fails to build because Deprecated
is missing in the newly generated dependencies.
Are you sure the keys in sources
are casefolded? I guess they aren't but haven't run the debugger on it.
I just came up with the very small change in #430 which works for me. Now I see #429 which looks a lot more complex. Not sure what issues it needs to solve though, maybe that complexity is necessary.
There is a difference in the x-checker-data, but the data checker doesn't seem to care:
x-checker-data:
- name: Deprecated [my version and the status quo before this regression]
+ name: deprecated [@bbhtt's version]
because you are lowercasing it in only one place - sources
, anyway that doesn't cause any functional difference.
Currently flatpak builder doesn't handle packages with caps in them properly. i.e. it does not generate the sources appropriately for, say,
PyYAML
.