Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
Currently, you'd have to modify the code to do this. Line 128 of search.py sets
the
default number of results.
Original comment by charliej...@gmail.com
on 25 Sep 2008 at 1:12
ehmm I Can found only a Search.pyo in the file library.zip. Is it the right
file? I
cannot find the search.py Opening search.py with notepad is not the solution
right?
If it is the right file, what editor should I use to edit it?
regards
Original comment by robi...@gmail.com
on 27 Sep 2008 at 9:30
If you want to make these changes, you'll have to download and run the Flax
code from
the command line as native Python (the Flax Basic package contains only compiled
object code). There are details of how to run Flax in this way at
http://code.google.com/p/flaxcode/source/browse/trunk/README .
Original comment by charliej...@gmail.com
on 29 Sep 2008 at 8:44
I gave a look at
http://code.google.com/p/flaxcode/source/browse/trunk/w32setup/HowToBuildFlaxSta
ndalo
neOnWindows.txt ... oh my god it doesn't seem easy :-( giving it up :-( anyway
thank
you for spent time to help me
regards
Gerlando
Original comment by robi...@gmail.com
on 29 Sep 2008 at 12:09
You don't have to build it - those are instructions for creating the package.
You can
run it unpackaged using Python, this is what the README file explains - this
isn't
very difficult.
Original comment by charliej...@gmail.com
on 29 Sep 2008 at 12:20
Original comment by charliej...@gmail.com
on 27 Aug 2009 at 1:26
I followed the instruction given, strictly STEP BY STEP, and after some
thousands of
attempts i can quitely say that the instructions are useless, no doubt about
that
Regards
Original comment by robi...@gmail.com
on 1 Dec 2009 at 2:34
It isn't easy I'm afraid, sorry, and you'll certainly need to know a bit of
Python.
However we're currently working on a new release of Flax Basic, we'll make sure
the
READMEs are updated when this is done. A lot of the previous complications to
do with
libraries etc. have gone away as various bugs in them have been fixed, so it
should
be simpler.
Original comment by lemurcon...@gmail.com
on 2 Dec 2009 at 8:51
I'm sorry, maybe I was a little bit rude but I got extremly desperate to get
the
packages works all togheter. Anyway I'm a flax basic's fan so I'll keep waiting
to
enjoy the new version of flax basic
Regards
Original comment by robi...@gmail.com
on 5 Dec 2009 at 8:22
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
robi...@gmail.com
on 18 Sep 2008 at 2:10