Describe the Bug
Cases on Case Inventory report are not sorting by docket number correctly (oldest to newest) consistently. Could be related to cases older than 2010 sorting unexpectedly
If I run a Case Inventory report for Judge Holmes, I get a case count of 255 cases, and the oldest showing in the UI is a 2010 docket number (5242-10). He’s got 255 cases in his inventory, so I can hit the “Load More” button. For the first 8 clicks, it adds cases to the bottom of the list (i.e., more recent cases). On the 9th click (if I counted correctly) it added several pre-2010 cases to the top of the list. It seems like those cases should have been at the top of the list to begin with.
Business Impact/Reason for Severity
In which environment did you see this bug?
Court's test environment (by Judge Buch); replicated in Flexion's prod (Jessica)
Who were you logged in as?
What were you doing when you discovered this bug? (Using the application, demoing, smoke tests, testing other functionality, etc.)
Testing
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Go to Case Inventory
Select Judge Holmes
Run Report
Load all case results
Expected Behavior
Cases should display sorted oldest to newest by docket number for all cases returned in the report.
Actual Behavior
5242-10 is displaying as the first (oldest) case in the report on initial load. After the list is fully expanded, 1144-05 is displaying first in the list.
Screenshots
Initial Load:
Fully Expanded:
Desktop (please complete the following information):
OS: [e.g. iOS]
Browser [e.g. chrome, safari]
Version [e.g. 22]
Smartphone (please complete the following information):
Device: [e.g. iPhone6]
OS: [e.g. iOS8.1]
Browser [e.g. stock browser, safari]
Version [e.g. 22]
Cause of Bug, If Known
Process for Logging a Bug:
Complete the above information
Add a severity tag (Critical, High Severity, Medium Severity or Low Severity). See below for priority definition.
Severity Definition:
Critical Defect
Blocks entire system's or module’s functionality
No workarounds available
Testing cannot proceed further without bug being fixed.
High-severity Defect
Affects key functionality of an application
There's a workaround, but not obvious or easy
App behaves in a way that is strongly different from the one stated in the requirements
Medium-severity Defect
A minor function does not behave in a way stated in the requirements.
Workaround is available and easy
Low-severity Defect
Mostly related to an application’s UI
Doesn't need a workaround, because it doesn't impact functionality
FOR ENGINEERING TEAM ONLY
Bug Resolution Steps:
[ ] Determine why the bug wasn't caught by a test.
[ ] Determine if an automated test needs to fixed, expanded or created. If unsure, bring in others to discuss.
[ ] Determine if a manual test needs to be fixed, expanded or created. If unsure, bring in others to discuss.
[ ] If needed, automated test is created.
[ ] If needed, manual test is created.
[ ] Reason for bug has been documented.
[ ] Fix has been deployed to dev environment.
[ ] Fix has been deployed to the stage environment.
[x] Bug has been tested in staging (UX or Engineering).
Describe the Bug Cases on Case Inventory report are not sorting by docket number correctly (oldest to newest) consistently. Could be related to cases older than 2010 sorting unexpectedly
If I run a Case Inventory report for Judge Holmes, I get a case count of 255 cases, and the oldest showing in the UI is a 2010 docket number (5242-10). He’s got 255 cases in his inventory, so I can hit the “Load More” button. For the first 8 clicks, it adds cases to the bottom of the list (i.e., more recent cases). On the 9th click (if I counted correctly) it added several pre-2010 cases to the top of the list. It seems like those cases should have been at the top of the list to begin with.
Business Impact/Reason for Severity
In which environment did you see this bug? Court's test environment (by Judge Buch); replicated in Flexion's prod (Jessica)
Who were you logged in as?
What were you doing when you discovered this bug? (Using the application, demoing, smoke tests, testing other functionality, etc.) Testing
To Reproduce Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Expected Behavior Cases should display sorted oldest to newest by docket number for all cases returned in the report.
Actual Behavior 5242-10 is displaying as the first (oldest) case in the report on initial load. After the list is fully expanded, 1144-05 is displaying first in the list.
Screenshots Initial Load: Fully Expanded:
Desktop (please complete the following information):
Smartphone (please complete the following information):
Cause of Bug, If Known
Process for Logging a Bug:
Severity Definition:
Critical Defect Blocks entire system's or module’s functionality No workarounds available Testing cannot proceed further without bug being fixed.
High-severity Defect Affects key functionality of an application There's a workaround, but not obvious or easy App behaves in a way that is strongly different from the one stated in the requirements
Medium-severity Defect A minor function does not behave in a way stated in the requirements. Workaround is available and easy
Low-severity Defect Mostly related to an application’s UI Doesn't need a workaround, because it doesn't impact functionality
FOR ENGINEERING TEAM ONLY Bug Resolution Steps: