flexion / ef-cms

An Electronic Filing / Case Management System.
23 stars 10 forks source link

Notice of Change to Remote Proceeding #9326

Closed cholly75 closed 2 years ago

cholly75 commented 2 years ago

As a docket clerk, so that I do not have to manually generate and serve needed documentation, I need DAWSON to generate and serve a Notice of Change to Remote Proceeding when a Trial Session with calendared cases has its proceeding type changed from In Person to Remote.

With COVID continuing to be an issue, some calendared trial sessions are being changed from In Person to Remote. When this happens, docket clerks must create a docket entry and generate a Notice of Change To Remote Proceeding for all open cases that are currently assigned to that trial session, then serve said notice. We would like DAWSON to do this for them.

Pre-Conditions

Acceptance Criteria

Notes

https://app.zenhub.com/files/152320868/79000e4f-dabc-445f-9ce5-bdf9bf9d20ac/download

Tasks

Test Cases

Story Definition of Ready (Created on 9/26/21)

The following criteria must be met in order for the user story to be picked up by the Flexion development team. The user story must:

Process: Flexion developers and designers will test if the story meets acceptance criteria and test cases in Flexion dev and staging environments (“standard testing”). If additional acceptance criteria or testing scenarios are discovered while the story is in progress, a new story should be created, added to the backlog and prioritized by the product owner.

Definition of Done (Updated 10-6-21)

Product Owner

UX

Engineering

ttlenard commented 2 years ago

Test Cases

1. Case w/ parties receiving both paper and electronic service are calendared for In Person trial session; Trial Session is changed from IP to Remote; NORP is generated for clerk for printing paper service, and is generated and served electronically; NORP appears on docket record

Expected Results:

Expected Results:

Expected Results:

2. Trial Session is changed from IP to Remote but the changes are not saved; no NORP is generated for any cases

Expected Results

3. Trial Session is changed from IP to Remote along with date/time values; NORP is generated using all new values on Trial Session

Expected Results:

Expected Results:

Expected Results:

4. NORPs are generated appropriately for all open cases on trial session, none are generated for closed cases on trial session

Expected Results:

Expected Results:

cholly75 commented 2 years ago

@mrinsin @jamesobrooks - confirmed, the Court would like to include the Chambers Phone associated with the trial session and display it in the Judge portion of the information boxes in the upper half of the document.

ttlenard commented 2 years ago

Some initial testing feedback:

1 - Seeing duplicate judges in the dropdown for judges (Sounds like this one isn't related to the Story): image.png

2 - I was on Test case 1 and received an error after changing from in-person to remote. "Trial session could not be edited. Please try again." The interesting thing was that SOME of the notices were added to the docket record, and service emails were sent on some. Here is the Trial session ID: 54ccc5e-d1c3-43c8-bf0e-11f75ecc7103 image.png

3 - I am also noticing that the service emails that are getting sent out are including michael.marcotte@ustaxcourt.gov. (Maybe this is always like this? Interesting...) image.png

cholly75 commented 2 years ago

Confirmed - seeing the same thing as @ttlenard 's #2 above - attempting to edit trial session to remote for the 4/4 San Francisco session w/ Judge Toro in TEST

cholly75 commented 2 years ago

Still seeing duplicate entries for judges Choi and Landy.