flexion / ef-cms

An Electronic Filing / Case Management System.
23 stars 10 forks source link

Issue 30 Day Notice of Trial #9970

Closed cholly75 closed 1 year ago

cholly75 commented 1 year ago

As a clerk, so that I don't have to manually docket NOTTs, I need to be able to easily generate and serve all NOTTs for a given trial session.

The recently added NOTT document is intended to be generated and served to pro se petitioners ~30 days prior to their trial date. To facilitate this, we would like to be able to generate and serve these documents automatically without needing to create, upload, and docket these individually for each eligible petitioner with a case attached to the trial session.

We will have 3 versions of this notice with different text depending on the Proceeding Type/Location values of the trial session.

Pre-Conditions

Acceptance Criteria

Notes

[https://app.zenhub.com/files/152320868/51a0f4a3-92b2-4d4f-b609-09c1ca112bcf/download] (In Person Notice)

https://app.zenhub.com/files/152320868/83113f8c-5812-449b-9073-b5ce995f9c47/download (Remote proceedings)

[https://app.zenhub.com/files/152320868/976cabc0-834b-4b27-b992-47c1475b0bd3/download] (Standalone Remote)

Tasks

Questions

Test Cases

Story Definition of Ready (updated on 12/23/22)

The following criteria must be met in order for the user story to be picked up by the Flexion development team. The user story must:

Definition of Done (Updated 5-19-22)

Product Owner

UX

Engineering

katiecissell commented 1 year ago

Expectation for the NOTT reminder, automatically go away? Ask users.

Why not just do it automatically? What are the negatives of automatically doing it? Case services want eyes on them; also have to consider paper service flow

Of the three types of notice/trial sets, which is most common or most rare? Standalone remote is rarer, one or two per term

User type - does this include both docket and petitions/calendar clerks? any other type? petitions, cotc, cs supervisor

Paper service - do we want to allow clerks to print them at a later time (printer issues, internet dies)? yes but not with this story; currently Tenille or Mike/Jim would need to pull them out and provide them if the user exits the screen

katiecissell commented 1 year ago

Figma File

ttlenard commented 1 year ago

Test Cases

1) Clerk navigates to an In Person trial session with a 30 day NOTT Reminder; Clicks the Serve/Dismiss link; Serves the Notices; Print for paper Service displays the Notices + Clinic Letters for Paper Pro Se Parties only.

Expected Results:

2) 30 Day Notice of Trial is added to the Docket Record for Cases with Pro Se Petitioners, Not on docket record for Cases with Represented Petitioners

Expected Results

3) Electronic Service was sent to Electronic Pro Se Petitioners; Electronic Service was not sent to represented Petitioner(s).

Expected Results:

4) Clerk navigates to a Remote (NOT STANALONE REMOTE) trial session with a 30 day NOTT Reminder; Clicks the Serve/Dismiss link; Serves the Notices; Print for paper Service displays the Notices + Clinic Letters for Paper Pro Se Parties only.

Expected Results:

5) 30 Day Notice of Trial is added to the Docket Record for Cases with Pro Se Petitioners, Not on docket record for Cases with Represented Petitioners

Expected Results

6) Electronic Service was sent to Electronic Pro Se Petitioners; Electronic Service was not sent to represented Petitioner(s).

Expected Results:

7) Clerk navigates to a Standalone Remote trial session with a 30 day NOTT Reminder; Clicks the Serve/Dismiss link; Serves the Notices; Print for paper Service displays the Notices for Paper Pro Se Parties only.

Expected Results:

8) 30 Day Notice of Trial is added to the Docket Record for Cases with Pro Se Petitioners, Not on docket record for Cases with Represented Petitioners

Expected Results

9) Electronic Service was sent to Electronic Pro Se Petitioners; Electronic Service was not sent to represented Petitioner(s).

Expected Results:

10) Clerk clicks the Yes, Dismiss link on the reminder; Clicks the Close link; Modal closes appropriately

Expected Results:

11) Clerk clicks the Yes, Dismiss link on the reminder; Clicks the Cancel link; Modal closes appropriately

Expected Results:

12) Clerk clicks the Yes, Dismiss link on the reminder; Clicks the Dismiss Reminder button; reminder and clock icon are no longer present.

Expected Results:

#### 13) Clerk can Serve the 30 Day Notice of Trial again if necessary.

- Continuing from the previous tests (as a Petitions Clerk) - Navigate to the Trial Sessions page - Click on the City, State link for a trial session that has a clock icon for the 30 Day Notice reminder, and ensure that you have already served a 30 Day Notice of Trial document on the cases for this trial session. - Click on the Serve/Dismiss link - Click on the Yes, Serve button

Expected Results - [ ] The workflow completes again, and all of the expected results from the tests above complete a second time as expected.

14) Other Court Staff are able to see the 30 day notice warning banner and clock icon, but are unable to clear the yellow warning banner from view.

Expected Results:

*Be sure to repeat this with all of the other court roles (besides Petitions clerk, CSS, or CotC) to ensure that the warning banner is not dismissible

15) Regression test to ensure that the reminder appears at the 35 day mark and disappears at the 29 day mark if the clerk doesn't dismiss it.

16) Be sure to test 1-13 with the CotC and the Case Services Supervisor roles. These users should be able to serve the NOTT.

rachelschneiderman commented 1 year ago

@ttlenard As part of this story, we will be locking down some Trial Session functionality. After this story has been deployed, only standalone remote trial sessions can be calendared without cases on the docket. All other trial sessions will have to have at least one case on their docket to be calendared.

rachelschneiderman commented 1 year ago
zachrog commented 1 year ago

After talking with UX we will be making the modal have three options. Serve, Dismiss Notice, and Cancel.

ttlenard commented 1 year ago

@rachelschneiderman @codyseibert @zRogersFlexion

Testing Feedback. I stopped testing after test case 3

Screen grab of the Edit Docket Entry screen for the NOTT.
image.png

ttlenard commented 1 year ago

@codyseibert @zRogersFlexion @rachelschneiderman

More testing Feedback Test Case 7 - Standalone Remote Trial Sessions - The appropriate Clinic Letter isn't getting appended to any of the Notices.

Updated comment: Nevermind! Standalone Remote wouldn't have clinic letters since there isn't a location tied to it! My bad!