Closed Aliazzzz closed 4 years ago
Hi, Many reasons
TestManager
(it's not exactly the same, but it already allows thorough testing)I'm planning to extend the library with automation, i.e. automatic test case creation. I punched down some examples so far, but there is big room for improvement.
Any feedback is welcome!
Florian
Dear Florian,
Yes 2.3 is rather obsolete as it has been around for at least a good 12 to 15 years. Time has come to leave v23 for what it is and move on. Migration to v3.5 is fairly easy but is dependent on the expertise of the software-engineer. Maybe a well written v23 to v35 migration tool makes more sense then sustaining a fear of migration (the CODESYS tool requires much manual labour afterwards). V23 will soon lack updates and thus forms a potential security risk. Offcourse, it is up to the plant manager to decide what is best for them.
That said, I will definitely check out your hard work for v2.3 as a good unit-testing was lacking until now. Also we (I) cordially welcome you to take a look at our allready mature MIT licensed, free and opensource unit-testing framework for TwinCAT3 (TcUnit) and CODESYS3 (CfUnit). We can always use people like you to help us realise our dreams.
We are close to releasing v1.1.0.0 which will contain many new features and exporting a testresults.xml file in jUnit format for integration in CI/CD environments. https://forge.codesys.com/svn/prj,cfunit,code/landingpage/index.html?raw and www.tcunit.org
Thanks for your invite :)
Yes, 2.3 is around since 2003 if I'm not wrong. 3S software actually announced that they will discontinue bug-fixing and maintenance starting from December 2019, so now. However, as part of my research i conducted some investigation on use and practices, and as of 2017 around 60% of hardware manufacturers in the CoDeSys Alliance still used CoDeSys 2.3 on their devices. Thinking of the fact that v.3 launched first in the late 00's it's astonishing. I worked with TwinCat3 and CoDeSys 3.x and both are based on extensible platforms, 2.3 isn't. So for me it is a nice to cover and I see it as an opportunity to increase reliability of what's there. Migration has to happen, but I'm afraid it will take a while. Fortunately my library will work also on 3.5 systems.
Let's keep contact. I will check out you system, and thanks again.
Florian
Thumbs up!
Ps We love to hear feedback from you. Plus, you can expect good feedback from me for your v23 project also.
Hi,
I was wondering why you have chosen CODESYS V2.3 for the implementation? I mean, what are your specific reasons?
With kind regards,
Aliazzz