Open fzdarsky opened 1 week ago
I think we can also include some conventions on how we store the github actions workflows if that's the automation platform we'll be sticking with, that could also include naming conventions for shared workflows, I'll think on a structure and post back here.
It would be useful to define and implement a convention on the structure of this repo and how produced artefacts (images, fleets, etc.) are named. This would make it easier
Below is a proposal to illustrate and start the discussion.
Repo structure and naming:
Demo naming:
Artefact naming: