jfdawson
commented
2 years ago IN short, if the mesh you generate with gmesh is too coarse you may not get a good representation of your geometry, but a fine mesh will take longer to process, so a mesh with just enough detail to represent your geometry is optimum.
Regards John Dawson Deputy Head, Communications Technology Research group Please book meetings via google calendar (Working days Mon-Thu) https://calendar.google.com and search for my e-mail address /------------------------------------------------------------------\ | J. F. Dawson Phone: 01904 322356 | | Dept. of Electronic Engineering | | University of York @.*** | | Heslington /\ /\ /\ /\ /\ /\ | | York / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ | | YO10 5DDwww.york.ac.uk/electronic-engineering/staff/john_dawson | ------------------------------------------------------------------/ Disclaimer:www.york.ac.uk/docs/disclaimer/email.htm
On 16/05/2022 11:03, Apostolos wrote:
Having little experience with Gmsh, is there a particular configuration you'd recommend based on your experience, for optimal antenna meshing (e.g. for microstrip designs)? Not sure kinds of inputs this tool handles best.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/flintoftid/aegmesher/issues/2, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKAEZFTFTUUIDHAYTXVOG73VKIMONANCNFSM5WA55NIA. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
Having little experience with Gmsh, is there a particular configuration you'd recommend based on your experience, for optimal antenna meshing (e.g. for microstrip designs)? Not sure kinds of inputs this tool handles best.