Open magnus-madsen opened 1 year ago
@jaschdoc or @sockmaster27 Would either of you be interested?
So do you want a workaround in Flix or a PR in the PJBDD upstream that fixes it? In Flix, we could check for the number of available processors before using it and then possible switch to some other BDD package or the table based solution we had before BDDs were implemented. Thoughts?
PR to PJBDD that fixes it.
How urgent is it? It seems like @sockmaster27 has quite a lot of stuff to work on, so maybe I should do it? Unless of course he thinks this would be fun?
It is not urgent.
Okay, then it may be a while before I take a look at it. :)
After like 4 hours I still can't get that to build.
After like 4 hours I still can't get that to build.
Sucks :(
Maybe we need to add a workaround where we dont use PJBDD if there is one core.
Ill let Jakob take a stab at this (but it is not a priority for now).
I hope we can drop usage of PJBDD in the near future.
In upstream pjbdd