1) A license specified just in the package.json file is not really visible. Would you mind including the license text?
2) Would you mind specifying whether it is GPLv3 only or GPLv3 or later? The license identifier you are using is depcrecated because it is unclear. By default, it means the same as GPLv3 only. You should use one of the two suggested identifiers for GPLv3.
Personally I strongly suggest, if legally possible, GPL 3 or later, as it allows the project to upgrade in case of a new better version of the GPL (as well as to stick with version 3 in case of a new bad version of the GPL). I noticed, however, that the main app is GPLv3 only, so I figure it's what you intend. Even in this case, you shouldn't use the deprecated identifier.
Hi.
I know the license is GPLv3. However:
1) A license specified just in the package.json file is not really visible. Would you mind including the license text? 2) Would you mind specifying whether it is GPLv3 only or GPLv3 or later? The license identifier you are using is depcrecated because it is unclear. By default, it means the same as GPLv3 only. You should use one of the two suggested identifiers for GPLv3.
Personally I strongly suggest, if legally possible, GPL 3 or later, as it allows the project to upgrade in case of a new better version of the GPL (as well as to stick with version 3 in case of a new bad version of the GPL). I noticed, however, that the main app is GPLv3 only, so I figure it's what you intend. Even in this case, you shouldn't use the deprecated identifier.