Closed nashby closed 7 years ago
@nashby Thanks Vasiliy! Instead of removing it, could we just expand the range to include the number you found to be ok? So (6..8)
?
@floere Hey! Hmm, (6..8)
? I think it should be 6..10
in my case. And if I change it to 6..10
it'll be the same rule as above in the definition. Is it ok?
@nashby It's the amount of digits after the NDC, so for your case 8. Or do I misunderstand you?
(Sadly, I can't remember the origin of "663 mobile numbers have 6 digits". I must have assumed it to be correct when I added specs and wrote the text – changes are fine, in any case 😊)
@floere if I bring rule with (6..8)
back this one fails Phony.assert.plausible?('+43 663 1234 567890')
Since amount of digits 10 after 663
code. Or am I wrong?
Your initial example was 43 663 060377xx
, with 8 digits after 663
.
@floere right! Sorry, I used wrong number in specs. I updated PR!
@nashby Thanks for the PR and your patience! 😊 Released in 2.15.37 🚀
@floere thanks for merging! And thanks for great gem! ❤️
@nashby My pleasure! Also, it's mainly great due to the fantastic contributors! ❤️
We have a customer who confirmed that number
+43663060377xx
is correct Austrian mobile number.@floere do you remember anything about that
663 mobile numbers have 6 digits.
rule? Couldn't find anything on the internet.