Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Reviewing changes submitted by Ed.
Original comment by bgrisw...@gmail.com
on 28 Jan 2009 at 5:10
Thanks bgriswold. It a little rough because I have magic numbers that really
should
be a constant somewhere, I just wasn't sure where you put those types of
things.
Anyway, the general idea works. Hope this helps.
Original comment by emcpad...@gmail.com
on 28 Jan 2009 at 5:38
Hi Ed, I've done some testing and noticed a couple of things. Tweets are being
split
at the correct character limit, but I don't think words should be split. I also
don't
think the Splitter is considering direct messages or replies which should
prefix the
recipient user name with "@" or "D" on each split tweet. I'm planning to do
some
work on this this evening. Let me know if you want to jump on these items in
the interim.
Original comment by bgrisw...@gmail.com
on 28 Jan 2009 at 8:11
Sorry about that, I just was off by one on an index. I didn't catch it before
because I tested it with lipsum orem generated text so I didn't notice the
words
were cutting in the wrong place.
I also added the @ and D addresses to the beginning of each split tweet taking
care
to make sure it fell within the 140 limit. This was there so this should have
worked...weird.
Anyways I attached the changed file...thanks for looking at this!
...Ed
Original comment by emcpad...@gmail.com
on 29 Jan 2009 at 4:18
Attachments:
Hi Ed, No worries. Thanks for the updates. I wish I checked in earlier as I
started
updating the logic a bit myself. I'll check out your changes in the morning.
For now,
I'm attaching my code (not yet committed) if you would like to review. I think
it's a
nice combination of both of our work. Thanks again for the contribution. By the
way,
I noticed your MainWindow.xml.cs was out of date. You may want to get latest.
Original comment by bgrisw...@gmail.com
on 29 Jan 2009 at 9:19
Attachments:
Ed, I'll echo Ben here - great to see you contributing, it's very much
appreciated!
It'll be a little easier to get your changes integrated if you can create
patches.
Scott Hanselman wrote a great (if overly thorough) walkthrough on that here:
http://www.hanselman.com/blog/ExampleHowToContributeAPatchToAnOpenSourceProjectL
ikeDa
sBlog.aspx
That's not a requirement - we're happy to take your code contributions as
you've been
sending them. But if you can submit them as patches, we'd be even happier. :-)
Original comment by jongallo...@gmail.com
on 29 Jan 2009 at 10:01
No problem Ben and Jon. I'd be more than happy to create a patch. I've never
contributed to Open Source so thanks for sending URL to Scott's how to post. I
will
put together a patch and send it back to you.
Original comment by emcpad...@gmail.com
on 29 Jan 2009 at 3:47
Hey Ben and Jon, I just created a patch for this on top of the latest trunk. I
also
made the code a lot more production ready. I wasn't sure where to put some
options
so I ended up putting them on the IServiceApi so they could be accessed from
anywhere although I don't think that is where they are supposed to go. I have
this
feature turned on by default but it would seem to me that there should be some
user
selectable option that would allow the user to determine if they want this
behavior. Once you have a look and everything gets into the right place I
could
take this further to add the UI necessary to make this a selectable
option...let me
know if you would like me to do that.
In any case, glad I could contribute to such a interesting project, hopefully,
I'll
think of other useful features as I use it more.
Also, if I do submit other patches in the future, is this the right place for
me to
post them to you guys or is there someplace else I should be doing this?
Original comment by emcpad...@gmail.com
on 29 Jan 2009 at 7:30
Attachments:
Hi Ed, This is the place continue submitting patches (under the appropriate
issue, of
course.) When you submit you might want to CC me and/or Jon on the comment.
As for the patch, I'll review your changes as well as mine with Jon and
determine
when and what (read: how much) functionality should be committed.
Jon, I'm particularly interested in making sure we aren't missing any message
type
edge cases. For example, handling replies to more than one user at a time.
Thanks,
Ben
Original comment by bgrisw...@gmail.com
on 29 Jan 2009 at 9:48
Sounds good Ben. Whatever in there helps the cause you are welcome to.
Don't hesitate to ask any questions about what I did if you need to.
I'd be curious what edge-cases I missed, for future reference.
One other question: How do I cc you and Jon in the future? I couldn't see how
to do
that from this web interface.
Thanks Guys,
...Ed
Original comment by emcpad...@gmail.com
on 29 Jan 2009 at 9:56
Hi Ed, You are able to send your issue comments to other contributors by
including
their usernames in the "New Comment" CC field. Both Jon and I can be found in
the
list. Thanks.
Original comment by bgrisw...@gmail.com
on 30 Jan 2009 at 4:58
It's funny, I don't have a CC field that is part of this "Add a Comment" box.
Maybe
its because I am not a member/contributor. No problem...If I put new comments
on new
issues i will ping you in Twitter to let you know.
If you did need to discuss any of this with me I can be reached on Skype at:
emcpadden . Again, use or don't use whatever work for you... glad to help if
possible but I certainly don't want to make anymore work for anyone.
Original comment by emcpad...@gmail.com
on 30 Jan 2009 at 5:44
Committed on 1/31/2009 by Ben Griswold
Original comment by bgrisw...@gmail.com
on 1 Feb 2009 at 6:31
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
emcpad...@gmail.com
on 24 Jan 2009 at 5:51Attachments: