ejardim
commented
10 years ago Hi
sca was though for MP and exploratory runs, when you may not want the full blow of hessians and etc. a4aSCA is the workhorse and the one to be used in final assessments. We may think about a more integrated interface between the two. Having a shortcut for "assessment" is easy enought and we can put the option "assessment" in a deprecated status.
Something else, update git with the latest FLa4a. You have the 0.100.0 while git still has the 0.99.x .
Best
EJ
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Iago Mosqueira notifications@github.com wrote:
I am not convinced having 'MP' as default value for the fit argument in sca(FLStock, FLIndices) is really convenient. Most runs, and specially when it is called in an interactive session, are for stock assessment, while runs for the 'MP' option are commonly in a script, so writing it down once is less of a hassle.
Not sure what problems changing it would bring.
If that is not possible, I would add 'sa' or 'SA' as shortcuts to 'assessment'.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/flr/FLa4a/issues/55.
I am not convinced having 'MP' as default value for the fit argument in sca(FLStock, FLIndices) is really convenient. Most runs, and specially when it is called in an interactive session, are for stock assessment, while runs for the 'MP' option are commonly in a script, so writing it down once is less of a hassle.
Not sure what problems changing it would bring.
If that is not possible, I would add 'sa' or 'SA' as shortcuts to 'assessment'.