[error] [output:foward:foward.0] could not write foward entries V2.2.0 windows

[lisandrarocha1]

Bug Report

Describe the bug

To Reproduce The fluentbit.conf that we use [SERVICE] flush 5 daemon off log_level info log_file log\log.log parsers_file parsers.conf

[INPUT] Name tail Path D:\netserver*.log Tag data_index Ignore_Older 1h Path_Key filename multiline.parser multiline-regex Refresh_interval 5 Buffer_Max_Size 100MB Buffer_Chunk_Size 400k Mem_Buf_Limit 100MB DB C:\fluentbif_repo\data_index.db

[FILTER] Name record_modifier Match * Record hostname ${HOSTNAME}

[FILTER] Name parser Match * Key_Name filename Parser extract_filename Reserv_Data True

[OUTPUT] name forward Match * Host hostname1245 Port 24224 net.dns.resolver LEGACY

• Steps to reproduce the problem:

This is how our configuration is set. As the expected behavior is the fluent-bit agenda don’t stop so we not loose data in our index. But when this error happens, after a while the agent stop to send data to fluentd and we have to restart the agent

Your Environment

• Version used:2.2.0
• Configuration:
• Environment name and version (e.g. Kubernetes? What version?):fluentd version 1.16.1
• Server type and version: Rhel 8.7
• Operating System and version: windows server 2016
• Filters and plugins:

Additional context

[patrick-stephens]

I'm a little confused by your server type being RHEL and the OS being Windows - what do you mean?

Can you confirm that Fluentd is working correctly and not the cause of the backpressure? I.e. it is not overloaded so preventing any more sending to it.

What do the logs for Fluent Bit show? Run with log_level debug.

Can you confirm with two FB instances? One forwarding to the other with a null output to prevent any backpressure.

[lisandrarocha1]

Here we use the fluentD in a linux server. That is what I a mean. So, we have the fluent-bit version 2.2.0 in a windows server and the fluentD version 1.16.1 in a linux server.

The fluentd configuration doesn't seem to be the problem. Because we have other windows server sending data to that same fluentd server and we don't have this same problem.

I put the logs on debug to see. About the last line, I don't know if I understand what you mean. Send the data from one FB to other? Could you explain for me , please?

Thanks

[github-actions[bot]]

This issue is stale because it has been open 90 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 5 days. Maintainers can add the exempt-stale label.

[github-actions[bot]]

This issue was closed because it has been stalled for 5 days with no activity.