Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I see that the elastic cloud config in the fluentbit type doesn't match the same in fluentd (fluentd is a plugin.secret and flunetbit is a string). I see that Pull Request https://github.com/fluent/fluent-operator/pull/1169/ set the fluentd type as a secret but was never ported to the fluentbit type, is there any reason for this ?
Describe the solution you'd like
To allow the end user to configure cloud fields as secret pointers instead of strings in the fluentbit es output. Or if possible a union type that would allow the two to be interchangeable
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I see that the elastic cloud config in the fluentbit type doesn't match the same in fluentd (fluentd is a plugin.secret and flunetbit is a string). I see that Pull Request https://github.com/fluent/fluent-operator/pull/1169/ set the fluentd type as a secret but was never ported to the fluentbit type, is there any reason for this ?
Describe the solution you'd like
To allow the end user to configure cloud fields as secret pointers instead of strings in the fluentbit es output. Or if possible a union type that would allow the two to be interchangeable
Additional context
No response