Open sparrowt opened 1 month ago
Thanks for your report.
This is more likely enhancement request
rather than bug report
.
I think we need more opinions and ideas.
@daipom i saw this alternative https://github.com/socketry/falcon
Not sure if there are other alternatives, need to research more
@Athishpranav2003 Thanks! So, Falcon is an option for us!
Sorry, since I'm unfamiliar with these libraries and don't have much time this month, I cannot say for sure about the direction now.
It's similar for me Maybe others active in Ruby community can give some comments on this @Watson1978 ?
Fluentd has been used async-http and webrick for http server in in_http and RPC. I think it would be better to integrate them into one library (async-http, falcon or another).
The most popular Ruby web server is Puma: https://github.com/puma/puma
Describe the bug
Fluentd depends on
webrick
and uses it in quite a few places and thus although it's no longer included in ruby, it is required (e.g. the dockerfile installsruby-webrick
).There have been a fair few CVEs reported for webrick in recent years, but more worrying is that in response to a recent security vulnerability report, one of the maintainers said "webrick is not for production".
If fluentd contines to rely on this, it feels risky (e.g. maybe future reports may not be patched so quickly / at all).
Perhaps it would be wise to migrate each usage away from webrick to a production-suitable replacement?
To Reproduce
Install fluentd - you will not be able to do this without also installing webrick.
Expected behavior
We should move away from production use of a package which the maintainers no longer recommend for production use.
Your Environment
Your Configuration
Your Error Log
Additional context
No response