DISCUSS: Overlay Name grammar

fluffy / p2psip-base-master

Master copy of P2PSIP Base draft

0 stars 1 forks source link

DISCUSS: Overlay Name grammar #16

Closed deanwillis closed 11 years ago

deanwillis commented 11 years ago

Stephen Farrell asks (-23) section 14.15: is reg-name sufficiently clear for the overlay name? For example, that allows percent encoding - are those variant names all the same overlay? I guess so, but it'd be good to confirm and maybe say that in the document.

fluffy commented 11 years ago

Cullen to track down what is going on here. I think these need to be able to show up in DNS segments.

fluffy commented 11 years ago

have sent a pull request up for this

deanwillis commented 11 years ago

The text still says:

  RELOAD-URI = "reload://" destination "@" overlay "/"
           [specifier]

        destination = 1 * HEXDIG
  overlay = reg-name
  specifier = 1*HEXDIG

Is this right?

fluffy commented 11 years ago

the ABNF is less specific that is required by the normative text - I think that is OK.