search

flutter-actions / setup-fvm

Setup Flutter Version Management: A simple CLI to manage Flutter SDK versions.
MIT License
0 stars 0 forks source link

fvm use stable hangs on input? #1

Open borgejHNIKT opened 3 months ago

borgejHNIKT commented 3 months ago

Tried using this action today, but the build step "fvm use stable" looks like its hanging on user input? image

socheatsok78 commented 3 months ago

Hi @borgejHNIKT

Apologize for the mistake, since fvm use required interaction you won’t be able to do so while the workflow is running.

Instead you can use it like this:

echo yes | fvm use stable

This is missing for the README, so I’ll make sure to update it.

noga-dev commented 3 months ago

Hi @borgejHNIKT

Apologize for the mistake, since fvm use required interaction you won’t be able to do so while the workflow is running.

Instead you can use it like this:

echo yes | fvm use stable

This is missing for the README, so I’ll make sure to update it.

Doesn't fix it for me, issue persists

Isn't there a way to show output? Seems like it's stuck on some prompt.

socheatsok78 commented 3 months ago

Instead of using fvm use, can you change to this instead?

- name: Setup Flutter SDK
  run: echo yes | fvm install stable --skip-pub-get

I'm not anywhere near my computer at the moment, but this is what I have been using for the test workflow.

See https://github.com/flutter-actions/setup-fvm/blob/main/.github/workflows/dart.yml

kaal-dam commented 3 months ago

@noga-dev not sure if you found the solution but the script hang because if you run fvm use it ask you if you need to install the needed version if it's not installed and then it ask you if you want to add .fvm/ to your .gitignore making it two prompt and echo yes technically only help answering the first one

the first prompt is skipped if you already made a fvm install before

the second prompt is skipped if it find .fvm/ in the .gitignore (had to put it at the end of the .gitignore file for it to be recognized)

@socheatsok78 not sure if you can do anything on your side regarding that issue code wise, it's likely more something to do with documentation

noga-dev commented 3 months ago

Sorry I forgot to mention that I removed this action from my workflow for now

socheatsok78 commented 3 months ago

Thank you @kaal-dam for a detailed explanation.

Apologize for the inconvenience, work has been rough this week.

I will do more testing this weekend, to see what works and will keep it posted here.