Closed grondo closed 3 weeks ago
Ok, I've pushed changes that I believe address @garlick's comments (also had to add a URL to linkcheck ignore). This could use another pass.
I was wondering about that too. I wasn't sure if it was appropriate to go into that much detail in this RFC. I like your suggestion.
so it would work whether loaded on all ranks or just rank 0?
Side note: in the case of the Fluxion feasibility service, there will be a non-trivial memory hit for running this service module, so I think the intent is not to run it on every rank, but possibly rank 0 and the login nodes? I wonder if the sentence "all ranks or just rank 0" should be modified to state something along the lines of
...the service SHALL be loaded on one or more ranks that are upstream of any rank where job submission is expected.
Or something?
Works for me.
Uhh, I took a stab at it, but not too happy with the result. Feel free to suggest editing.
, therefore the feasibility service SHALL be loaded on one or more ranks upstream of any rank where job submission is expected.
maybe instead
. The request is routed to a local
feasibility
service if available, or an upstream one per RFC 3.
Thanks, I took your suggestion verbatim (sorry, having trouble with my prose today) and force-pushed the result.
I guess I'll set MWP here since this was approved. We can always update with future PRs.
This is a first cut at documenting the
feasibilty
service proposed in #384.Fixes #384