Closed einsweniger closed 4 years ago
I don't have a strong opinion either way. My setup has cargo
on $PATH
, and I guess you would want to add $CARGO_HOME
to $PATH
in order to use it outside of Emacs. In which case, flycheck-rust
would pick the right binary. Or is there a use-case I am missing?
I've given it more thought and you might be right, seems I'm kindof fighting windmills since many things expect cargo to be in $PATH
or even have it hard coded to .cargo/bin/cargo
. Since this is giving me more problems than it's worth having it not in ~/.cargo
and in $PATH
. Seems like a 'me' problem :P
Sorry for the noise :D
flycheck-rust is not using the CARGO_HOME environment variable to find the
cargo
command, but I think it should. I'd also think that$CARGO_HOME/bin/cargo
, should take precedence over the$PATH/cargo
executable.Might be wrong, tho :D