Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago
What kind of extra functionality do you need?
Original comment by arthur.b...@gmail.com
on 20 Dec 2012 at 2:17
If the extensions needed would work with and be useful to all Oracle drivers
and usage scenarios maybe RdbmsSpecifics base class itself should have factory
methods for all the spy classes then OracleRdbmsSpecifics could produce the new
subclass when the factory method is invoked.
Original comment by arthur.b...@gmail.com
on 20 Dec 2012 at 2:23
For example:
CallableStatement callableStatement
=eSession.getDbConnectionManager().acquireConnection().prepareCall(sqlText);
OracleCallableStatement oracleCallableStatement =
(OracleCallableStatement)callableStatement;
oracleCallableStatement.registerOutParameter("s", Types.VARCHAR);
oracleCallableStatement.execute();
We need to use oracle call because named parameters don't work properly with
standard jdbc api(oracle 11.2 jdbc driver).
We are going to use the extension to work with Oracle OCI driver
specific(OracleCallableStatement.registerIndexTableOutParameter).
We decide not to use OracleRdbmsSpecifics because suppose that extension will
not be useful to all Oracle drivers. But there are some base class that may be
used repeatedly.
We already implement this and Issue 5: Enhancement: Add ability to set
SpyLogDelegator.
After the functionality will be tested and pass revision, we attach the source.
Original comment by MatveevA...@gmail.com
on 21 Dec 2012 at 8:42
Most probably they need to change extension between different versions of
Oracle OCI driver because some interfaces may change.
Original comment by MatveevA...@gmail.com
on 21 Dec 2012 at 8:58
Oh I thought you needed this to log some extra event information in log4jdbc.
Instead of casting, can you not just use the Wrapper interface to accomplish
this task?
See http://docs.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/sql/Wrapper.html
Original comment by arthur.b...@gmail.com
on 21 Dec 2012 at 11:39
There is no problem to unwrap interfaces. Of course we want to log extra event
information in log4jdbc. For example we want to log registerOutParameter and
registerIndexTableOutParameter.
Original comment by MatveevA...@gmail.com
on 21 Dec 2012 at 12:56
If we will use unwrap we lose the ability to log.
Original comment by MatveevA...@gmail.com
on 21 Dec 2012 at 12:59
I understand - makes sense. Go ahead and implement for yourself and submit the
patch. If it's done at high quality with good testing, I may merge it later.
Original comment by arthur.b...@gmail.com
on 21 Dec 2012 at 1:01
Ok. I've attached .jar containing our improvements over log4jdbc.
We tried to implement the functionality the same way like it's done in logback.
Now we have a SpySelector interface:
public interface SpySelector {
public SpyFactory getSpyFactory();
public SpyLogDelegator getSpyLogDelegator();
}
SpyFactory is responsible for returning Spy entities (ConnectionSpy,
StatementSpy, ResultSetSpy, etc)
SpyLogDelegator is responsible for returning SpyLogDelegator (Captain Obvious
here)
Also there is SpyStaticBinder, that selects proper SpySelector (you can also
implement your own) based on 'log4jdbc.SpySelector' system property. If this
property is not set, it will select the DefaultSpySelector.
All spy entities are obtained through the SpyFactory (that is returned by
SpySelector implementation). I also tried to remove all static loggers use from
log4jdbc.
There are few important points you should pay attention in this implementation
- only Oracle Callable Statement spy is logged. Other Oracle statement classes
(OraclePreparedStatement/OracleStatement) have stub classes. OracleResult is
also not loggable.
- due to project needs OracleCallableStatementSpy is realised over several
ojbdc6 driver versions. It means that those OracleCallableStatement functions
are not supported by all ojdbc6 versions I worked with don't have an @override
annotation and throws UnsupportedOperation unchecked exception. Pay attention!
All new created code is covered by the same Apache v2 licence. I hope I didn't
make any mistakes with licence stuff, but if so, please inform me. Feel free to
use and modify the code due to your own needs.
Original comment by stas...@gmail.com
on 21 Jan 2013 at 6:38
Attachments:
[deleted comment]
I should point that it is experimental version and it was not heavily tested.
As well the idea was to have some basic functionality and the set of extensions.
Extension is the implementation of database-specific spy entities (like it's
done with Oracle - OracleCallableStatementSpy) and SpySelector/SpyFactories
implementations.
Original comment by stas...@gmail.com
on 21 Jan 2013 at 7:11
We also use this exstension for AOP
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspect-oriented_programming
for example to monitor transaction context.
Original comment by MatveevA...@gmail.com
on 7 Feb 2013 at 6:56
Hello.
We've performed some changes over SpyFactory and it's inheritors to make
logging disabling possible.
Now: SpyFactory interfaces now return Connection, Statement, ResultSet instead
of SpyConnection, SpyStatement, SpyResultSet.
Of course, SpyFactory implementations still can return Spy-entities (every
Spy-entity implement their entity interface).
But now you can return normal entity instead of Spy one, so logging for this
entity would be disabled.
You can take a look at this in net.sf.log4jdbc.factory.SpyFactory
Original comment by stas...@gmail.com
on 5 Apr 2013 at 9:17
Attachments:
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
MatveevA...@gmail.com
on 18 Dec 2012 at 9:13