Add lint-fix make target, add gci to flytectl, remove goimports make target

[Sovietaced]

This pull request introduces a lint-fix target that will automatically fix linting issues instead of running goimports, gci, or golangci-lint commands manually.

It also adds gci linting to flytectl. It appears that flytectl had golangci-lint config options for gci but the linter was not enabled.

Lastly, it removes the goimports make target which was pretty error prone. It did not respect the golangci-lint configs in each project and generated dramatically different fixes.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 60.99%. Comparing base (de415af) to head (40dafb4). Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #5484 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 61.00% 60.99% -0.02% ========================================== Files 793 793 Lines 51378 51419 +41 ========================================== + Hits 31342 31361 +19 - Misses 17149 17166 +17 - Partials 2887 2892 +5 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/flyteorg/flyte/pull/5484/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=flyteorg) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests-datacatalog](https://app.codecov.io/gh/flyteorg/flyte/pull/5484/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=flyteorg) | `69.31% <ø> (ø)` | | | [unittests-flyteadmin](https://app.codecov.io/gh/flyteorg/flyte/pull/5484/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=flyteorg) | `58.67% <ø> (-0.04%)` | :arrow_down: | | [unittests-flytecopilot](https://app.codecov.io/gh/flyteorg/flyte/pull/5484/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=flyteorg) | `17.79% <ø> (ø)` | | | [unittests-flytectl](https://app.codecov.io/gh/flyteorg/flyte/pull/5484/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=flyteorg) | `68.04% <ø> (ø)` | | | [unittests-flyteidl](https://app.codecov.io/gh/flyteorg/flyte/pull/5484/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=flyteorg) | `79.04% <ø> (ø)` | | | [unittests-flyteplugins](https://app.codecov.io/gh/flyteorg/flyte/pull/5484/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=flyteorg) | `61.83% <ø> (-0.01%)` | :arrow_down: | | [unittests-flytepropeller](https://app.codecov.io/gh/flyteorg/flyte/pull/5484/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=flyteorg) | `57.30% <ø> (ø)` | | | [unittests-flytestdlib](https://app.codecov.io/gh/flyteorg/flyte/pull/5484/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=flyteorg) | `65.82% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=flyteorg#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.