codecov[bot]
commented
1 week ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 61.00%. Comparing base (
f87a049) to head (e19a807).
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #5493 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 61.00% 61.00% ======================================= Files 794 794 Lines 51442 51442 ======================================= + Hits 31380 31383 +3 + Misses 17168 17166 -2 + Partials 2894 2893 -1 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/flyteorg/flyte/pull/5493/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=flyteorg) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests-datacatalog](https://app.codecov.io/gh/flyteorg/flyte/pull/5493/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=flyteorg) | `69.31% <ø> (ø)` | | | [unittests-flyteadmin](https://app.codecov.io/gh/flyteorg/flyte/pull/5493/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=flyteorg) | `58.73% <ø> (+0.02%)` | :arrow_up: | | [unittests-flytecopilot](https://app.codecov.io/gh/flyteorg/flyte/pull/5493/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=flyteorg) | `17.79% <ø> (ø)` | | | [unittests-flytectl](https://app.codecov.io/gh/flyteorg/flyte/pull/5493/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=flyteorg) | `68.03% <ø> (ø)` | | | [unittests-flyteidl](https://app.codecov.io/gh/flyteorg/flyte/pull/5493/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=flyteorg) | `79.04% <ø> (ø)` | | | [unittests-flyteplugins](https://app.codecov.io/gh/flyteorg/flyte/pull/5493/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=flyteorg) | `61.83% <ø> (ø)` | | | [unittests-flytepropeller](https://app.codecov.io/gh/flyteorg/flyte/pull/5493/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=flyteorg) | `57.30% <ø> (ø)` | | | [unittests-flytestdlib](https://app.codecov.io/gh/flyteorg/flyte/pull/5493/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=flyteorg) | `65.80% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=flyteorg#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Tracking issue
NA
Why are the changes needed?
We spend between 1 and 2 minutes installing python packages to run single-binary tests. Let's cut that to 1 second.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Use uv to install flytekit and other dependencies necessary to run functional tests in single-binary.
How was this patch tested?
Setup process
Screenshots
Check all the applicable boxes
Related PRs
Docs link