updated execution environment id field to name

[hamersaw]

Tracking issue

NA

Why are the changes needed?

Flyte uniformly uses the term id to represent a unique identifer and the term name to represent a human-readable name. In this protobuf spec, the unique environment ID will be an aggregation of project, domain, name, and version.

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

^^^

How was this patch tested?

Locally.

Setup process

Screenshots

Check all the applicable boxes

• [x] I updated the documentation accordingly.
• [x] All new and existing tests passed.
• [x] All commits are signed-off.

Related PRs

NA

Docs link

NA

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 60.99%. Comparing base (5cc7f58) to head (f7cc87d).

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #5514 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 60.99% 60.99% ======================================= Files 794 794 Lines 51475 51475 ======================================= Hits 31398 31398 Misses 17185 17185 Partials 2892 2892 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/flyteorg/flyte/pull/5514/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=flyteorg) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests-datacatalog](https://app.codecov.io/gh/flyteorg/flyte/pull/5514/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=flyteorg) | `69.31% <ø> (ø)` | | | [unittests-flyteadmin](https://app.codecov.io/gh/flyteorg/flyte/pull/5514/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=flyteorg) | `58.73% <ø> (ø)` | | | [unittests-flytecopilot](https://app.codecov.io/gh/flyteorg/flyte/pull/5514/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=flyteorg) | `17.79% <ø> (ø)` | | | [unittests-flytectl](https://app.codecov.io/gh/flyteorg/flyte/pull/5514/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=flyteorg) | `68.03% <ø> (ø)` | | | [unittests-flyteidl](https://app.codecov.io/gh/flyteorg/flyte/pull/5514/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=flyteorg) | `79.04% <ø> (ø)` | | | [unittests-flyteplugins](https://app.codecov.io/gh/flyteorg/flyte/pull/5514/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=flyteorg) | `61.85% <ø> (ø)` | | | [unittests-flytepropeller](https://app.codecov.io/gh/flyteorg/flyte/pull/5514/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=flyteorg) | `57.30% <ø> (ø)` | | | [unittests-flytestdlib](https://app.codecov.io/gh/flyteorg/flyte/pull/5514/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=flyteorg) | `65.59% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=flyteorg#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.