Feature Request: support for gitea / forgejo API

[alexdelprete]

Hi @fmartinou,

I'm running a forgejo instance in my homelab. forgejo is a soft-fork of gitea, so it uses the same API basically.

The forgejo project is hosted on codeberg.org public registry (it uses forgejo as backend).

I was wondering if WUD could support the gitea/forgejo API, so both public and private registries could be supported.

The API is here: https://try.gitea.io/api/swagger (forgejo API should be the same, it's here: https://codeberg.org/api/swagger).

Thanks a lot.

[fmartinou]

Hi @alexdelprete ,

The support for both gitea and forgejo has been added!

• https://fmartinou.github.io/whats-up-docker/#/configuration/registries/gitea/
• https://fmartinou.github.io/whats-up-docker/#/configuration/registries/forgejo/

It's available from version 6.3.0

[alexdelprete]

Thank you so much @fmartinou, hope it didn't take too much of your time implementing this.

I tested it both in my forgejo homelab instance and codeberg.org, everything seems to be working fine. :)

I have 2 questions:

1. I'd like to use both my private forgejo instance and codeberg.org. Is this a supported use case? 2 instances of the same registry type.
2. Forgejo and Gitea support Application Access Tokens with fine grained scope support, would it be possible to also support that?

Thank you again for this. :)

[fmartinou]

Hi @alexdelprete ,

Thank you for the feedback. 👍

I'd like to use both my private forgejo instance and codeberg.org. Is this a supported use case? 2 instances of the same registry type.

Unfortunately it's not supported. => It makes sense; I add it to my TODO list

Forgejo and Gitea support Application Access Tokens with fine grained scope support, would it be possible to also support that?

=> I'll try to implement it.

[alexdelprete]

Thank you so much for your support.