Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
This issue was closed by revision r151.
Original comment by jpfitzne...@gmail.com
on 8 Feb 2012 at 10:11
I guess you're using SOLR as search subsystem?
There seems to be an issue if you use a short QNAME (e.g. cm:name) as sort
field.
We therefore now using {http://www.alfresco.org/model/content/1.0}name
Result set should now be sorted by name (ascending)
Original comment by ecm.exp...@gmail.com
on 8 Feb 2012 at 10:15
fixed jar:
http://code.google.com/p/fme-alfresco-extensions/downloads/detail?name=tag-query
-dashlet-0.3.2.jar
Original comment by ecm.exp...@gmail.com
on 8 Feb 2012 at 10:18
It is pretty much working now but the ASCII sort seems a little off. Sort
result:
1.1 abc
1.2 abc
1. abc
i.e. it is placing ascii 32 (space) below numbers. If the space is changed to
a - (dash) the dash still comes after the numbers.
Should I file a separate issue?
Original comment by mu...@dsty.ac.jp
on 10 Feb 2012 at 12:19
well, you should observe the same sort order when you're using the tag-search
within a document library (because the same repository tier webscript is used).
From my point of view the sort order is correct (it's how Alfresco is sorting):
1.1 abc
1.2 abc
1. abc
Executing an alphabetic sort "1" is smaller than " " or "-" or "a"...
But feel free to open Issue here (https://issues.alfresco.com/jira/) or raise a
support ticket if you're an enterprise customer.
Original comment by ecm.exp...@gmail.com
on 10 Feb 2012 at 12:27
hi,
alfresco seems to remove spaces before sorting, e.g. you'll get the following
sort order:
1.1 abc
1. 1abc
1.2 abc
cheers, jan
Original comment by ecm.exp...@gmail.com
on 10 Feb 2012 at 4:30
I think it removes more than just spaces, i.e. the dash has no effect on the
order either. As I tried a few other characters too, I would hazard a guess
that possibly all non-alpha numerics are removed.
I guess the only ways to correct the sort order for a dotted numerical index
would be to comment out that code, or change the API to accept a non-removal
parameter, or implement a custom sort routine.
The first may have side effects. The third seems a case of reinventing the
wheel.
The second is the most preferable but would involve us becoming an enterprise
customer unless such a parameter already exists. Enterprise is a possibility
for the future but will have to wait as we are just starting to investigate the
possibilities with Alfresco.
In the meantime, we'll have to make do with the less clear (no indents)
numbering scheme of:
1.0 parent folder
1.1 child folder 1
1.2 child folder 2
I may do some digging and see if I can find the API to check what the
possibilities are.
Original comment by mu...@dsty.ac.jp
on 11 Feb 2012 at 1:31
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
mu...@dsty.ac.jp
on 7 Feb 2012 at 11:33