Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
This sounds a lot like AOP. How important is this (and the many other
AsyncProvider feature requests)? I'm happy to add more stuff to Gin but I'd
like to make sure that we only add things that are actually useful to many
people.
Original comment by aragos
on 3 Nov 2010 at 5:08
TBH, I think it might not be worth the extra complexity. It's already possible
to run extra code by either just implementing your own AsyncProvider, or using
AsyncProvider<Provider<T>>.
Original comment by dburr...@google.com
on 4 Nov 2010 at 6:51
Marking as "Won't fix" for now since there's an easy workaround and not too
much interest for something complex.
Original comment by aragos
on 21 Jan 2011 at 9:23
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
dburr...@google.com
on 2 Nov 2010 at 7:05