Closed csoneson closed 3 years ago
Merging #45 (3b5c5fe) into master (05f403f) will increase coverage by
0.00%
. The diff coverage is99.52%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #45 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 99.51% 99.51%
=======================================
Files 13 13
Lines 2041 2071 +30
=======================================
+ Hits 2031 2061 +30
Misses 10 10
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
R/motif_enrichment_wrapper.R | 100.00% <ø> (ø) |
|
R/motif_finding.R | 98.33% <ø> (ø) |
|
src/countKmerPairs.cpp | 98.76% <ø> (ø) |
|
R/pfm_comparison.R | 99.18% <75.00%> (ø) |
|
R/binning.R | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
R/motif_enrichment_HOMER.R | 99.61% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) |
:arrow_up: |
R/motif_enrichment_kmers.R | 98.93% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) |
:arrow_up: |
R/motif_enrichment_monaLisa.R | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
R/plotting.R | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
R/sample_random_regions.R | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
... and 2 more |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 05f403f...3b5c5fe. Read the comment docs.
One general thing I am not sure about: There are many occurrences of something like:
attr(bins, "bin0")
. Should we replace them bygetZeroBin(bins)
? It will probably create a bit of overhead that can be negleted, but using the interface might shield us from potential changes of the underlying implementation? On the other hand, the current code works and there are other attributes for which we do not provide any API at the moment.
Conceptually, my thought would be yes - replace by getZeroBin(bins)
, for the reason you give above. However, there may be more pressing issues to prioritize.
Unrelated to the k-mer changes; fixes to address issues raised by
BiocCheck