Closed fmrico closed 4 years ago
@fmrico thanks for this. I have to admit I haven't been actively using or maintaining this in ages. Maybe it would be best if I tranfer the "maintainership" to you? Happy to transfer ownership of this repository to you (and then fork back if needed)?
Hi @marc-hanheide,
When you proposed transfer repo, my early opinion would be more convenient than the maintainer was someone who works on planning.
I use planning in my robot systems, but I don't develop planning algorithms.
After thinking about it these days, I believe there are good reasons to accept your invitation. I want popf to be the reference in my planning system. If the community starts using my system, planning experts may be attracted to contribute to popf. I could give it a push to be included as a package in the ROS2 distribution. That would solve my dependence on it.
Summarizing, I would be happy to receive ownership of this repository if you consider it still positive.
Best
Ok, cool. I think it's best if you take ownership in this case. But I can do the transfer at the moment (just tried) because:
The target account must not have a repository with the same name, or a fork in the same network.
So, you'd have to remove your fork temporarily. Hence, I'll first accept your PR now and then you'll have to remove the fork. After that, ping me and I'll do the transfer.
Hi @marc-hanheide ,
I have just removed my fork
I have requested the transfer now. You should have an email.
Hi @marc-hanheide
This PR is for using popf as a library. Probably this PR can not be accepted as is, but it can push forward this development. We can refine this PR with your comments.
These changes are for ROS2. Maybe it should be in another branch.
Until now, it only could be used through the executable popf. The goal of this PR is using popf as a library too. Now, I can do:
Best
Signed-off-by: Francisco Martin Rico fmrico@gmail.com