Closed ZaheenJ closed 1 month ago
Thanks for the PR. I'm not sure if we need this considering that we already have %_H
and %_I
. Is there any benefit other than these being a bit shorter?
Only real benefit is it matches the manpages for date
and strftime
. (Personally I was using the date
manpage to configure my Waybar.)
I think it's more important to minimize the divergence from the standard formatter than to try mimic GNU strftime. But thanks for the PR anyway.
Trivially support "%k" and "%l", which strftime supports as equivalents to "%_H" and "%_I" respectively. Previous discussion here #3976